IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hybi] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-08.txt

Salvatore Loreto <salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com> Thu, 09 June 2011 11:10 UTC

Return-Path: <salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3A7C11E80B6 for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 04:10:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.001, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iu5quwVvKYjt for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 04:10:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw9.se.ericsson.net (mailgw9.se.ericsson.net [193.180.251.57]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 838BA11E80A7 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 04:10:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb39-b7bfdae000005125-37-4df0aa2cab03
Received: from esessmw0184.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw9.se.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 3A.22.20773.C2AA0FD4; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 13:10:36 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail.lmf.ericsson.se (153.88.115.8) by esessmw0184.eemea.ericsson.se (153.88.115.82) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.3.137.0; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 13:10:35 +0200
Received: from nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se [131.160.33.3]) by mail.lmf.ericsson.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D8D423F5 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 14:10:35 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46F69509C3 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 14:10:35 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from n211.nomadiclab.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 030BD50152 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 14:10:34 +0300 (EEST)
Message-ID: <4DF0AA2A.1030708@ericsson.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 14:10:34 +0300
From: Salvatore Loreto <salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: hybi@ietf.org
References: <20110608173012.14596.50398.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <BANLkTi=AsE_jHV_tMTEZEcaLnQZCBMp_jA@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTimJSAF8NVEP87AG0u8Shzvk+p12RA@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTikD-WFE+uctHGovg9atezSd9nEe_N6aLsog5X65pS2xkw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTikD-WFE+uctHGovg9atezSd9nEe_N6aLsog5X65pS2xkw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------030707010702040309070502"
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Subject: Re: [hybi] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-08.txt
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 11:10:51 -0000

On 6/9/11 6:21 AM, Takeshi Yoshino wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 08:23, Ian Fette (イアンフェッティ)
> <ifette@google.com <mailto:ifette@google.com>> wrote:
>
>     On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com
>     <mailto:gregw@intalio.com>> wrote:
>
>         * The fragments of one message may not be interleaved between the
>
>         fragments of another message unless an extension has been
>         negotiated
>         that can interpret the interleaving.
>
>
>     anyone else have thoughts here? it seems reasonable to me but I'd
>     like to hear other opinions.
>
>
> I think it's good for clarification (though when we read the
> fragmentation spec, it's clear that interleaving doesn't work without
> extension).
>
> It's a small edit.
>
I agree

/Sal

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email