Re: [hybi] #1: HTTP Compliance

Adam Barth <ietf@adambarth.com> Sun, 15 August 2010 18:12 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@adambarth.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 201D63A682D for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 11:12:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.987
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.987 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.499, BAYES_05=-1.11, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ja+ZieMkAcbg for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 11:12:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-iw0-f172.google.com (mail-iw0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ADD13A6403 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 11:12:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iwn3 with SMTP id 3so941216iwn.31 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 11:13:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.231.182.204 with SMTP id cd12mr4766484ibb.101.1281895990280; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 11:13:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-iw0-f172.google.com (mail-iw0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h8sm3655089ibk.9.2010.08.15.11.13.09 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 15 Aug 2010 11:13:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iwn3 with SMTP id 3so941201iwn.31 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 11:13:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.231.193.11 with SMTP id ds11mr3952978ibb.192.1281895987157; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 11:13:07 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.231.60.18 with HTTP; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 11:12:47 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <ae7473f15c4839c4efba4ea9fc4c0953.squirrel@sm.webmail.pair.com>
References: <ae7473f15c4839c4efba4ea9fc4c0953.squirrel@sm.webmail.pair.com>
From: Adam Barth <ietf@adambarth.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 11:12:47 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTinfY-g3zpCCWLov+384j-45cdCCzb1Cq+ByJVB2@mail.gmail.com>
To: shelby@coolpage.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: hybi@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [hybi] #1: HTTP Compliance
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 18:12:36 -0000

On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Shelby Moore <shelby@coolpage.com> wrote:
> My objective was to make sure I understood well the issues (including the
> view opposing the concensus) and possibly to swing them and any lurkers to
> the concensus declaration:
>
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi/current/msg02955.html

That "declaration of consensus" was premature.  The working group has
not reached consensus on that point.

Adam