Re: [hybi] Proposed Charter for HyBi WG (rev.3)
Martin Tyler <martin.tyler@boo.org> Mon, 02 November 2009 09:01 UTC
Return-Path: <martin.tyler@boo.org>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 397CB3A681E for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Nov 2009 01:01:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.976
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.976 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MMfCk3weWCJH for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Nov 2009 01:01:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yw0-f183.google.com (mail-yw0-f183.google.com [209.85.211.183]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47E0E3A67B8 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Nov 2009 01:01:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: by ywh13 with SMTP id 13so5127155ywh.29 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Mon, 02 Nov 2009 01:01:52 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.101.86.11 with SMTP id o11mr2651716anl.151.1257152512799; Mon, 02 Nov 2009 01:01:52 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4AEE421B.7030808@webtide.com>
References: <4AE966CA.9090907@ericsson.com> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0910300047310.25608@hixie.dreamhostps.com> <4AEABDBF.80705@ericsson.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20091030120030.043cff78@resistor.net> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0910310335580.25616@hixie.dreamhostps.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20091031080527.040fe028@resistor.net> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0911012010470.27039@hixie.dreamhostps.com> <4AEE421B.7030808@webtide.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 09:01:52 +0000
Message-ID: <44abafb90911020101j1be60032v81767e6cc8dbe4b6@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Tyler <martin.tyler@boo.org>
To: Greg Wilkins <gregw@webtide.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001636eedfe7f434a904775fa0d8"
Cc: "hybi@ietf.org" <hybi@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [hybi] Proposed Charter for HyBi WG (rev.3)
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 09:01:34 -0000
aa On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 2:21 AM, Greg Wilkins <gregw@webtide.com> wrote: > > With that work, none of my clients have ever asked: > > Can you reduce latency from 150ms to 50ms > Can you reduce the verbosity of the HTTP headers you send > Can you reduce the verbosity of the bayeux protocol (it is verbose, but > it can be compressed). > Some of our customers ask the first question. They also ask about message size, but not specifically about HTTP headers or anything. To Ian: The kilobytes of headers I have not seen and I very much doubt any implementation would be sending the same amount of headers on each WebSocket/BWTP message that they do for an individual HTTP request. It's likely to be a mime type, and optional at that, so no overhead at all if all your messages are the same mime type > These have just not been significant issues. > > What they have asked for is: > > Can this work through our existing network infrastructure, load balancers > etc. > Can we layer our special version of OAUTH on top. > Can we encrypt/sign messages without SSL > How can we increase the number of users connected per node. > Our carrier is charging us per connection - can we reduce connection > usage. > How do we know this message was delivered. > Why are connections being closed by the "network" > > > Yes, these are all valid questions which we have to deal with too. Network infrastructure can be a biggie, and anything we can do to make it work with existing infrastructure would be great, rather than saying 'disconnect'
- [hybi] Proposed Charter for HyBi WG (rev.3) Salvatore Loreto
- Re: [hybi] Proposed Charter for HyBi WG (rev.3) Ian Hickson
- Re: [hybi] Proposed Charter for HyBi WG (rev.3) Greg Wilkins
- Re: [hybi] Proposed Charter for HyBi WG (rev.3) Salvatore Loreto
- Re: [hybi] Proposed Charter for HyBi WG (rev.3) SM
- Re: [hybi] Proposed Charter for HyBi WG (rev.3) Ian Hickson
- Re: [hybi] Proposed Charter for HyBi WG (rev.3) Greg Wilkins
- Re: [hybi] Proposed Charter for HyBi WG (rev.3) SM
- Re: [hybi] Proposed Charter for HyBi WG (rev.3) Ian Hickson
- Re: [hybi] Proposed Charter for HyBi WG (rev.3) Greg Wilkins
- Re: [hybi] Proposed Charter for HyBi WG (rev.3) Martin Tyler
- Re: [hybi] Proposed Charter for HyBi WG (rev.3) Salvatore Loreto