[hybi] Proposed Charter (rev.3) (W3C WebApps-Whatwg)

Salvatore Loreto <salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com> Fri, 30 October 2009 08:36 UTC

Return-Path: <salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F28B3A680B for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 01:36:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.239, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vKkFXc3CgLbK for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 01:36:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw4.ericsson.se (mailgw4.ericsson.se [193.180.251.62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E964D3A67E5 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 01:36:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb3e-b7bf6ae000005dda-4d-4aeaa5952148
Received: from esealmw128.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by mailgw4.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 68.1B.24026.595AAEA4; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 09:36:37 +0100 (CET)
Received: from esealmw128.eemea.ericsson.se ([153.88.254.176]) by esealmw128.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 30 Oct 2009 09:35:42 +0100
Received: from mail.lmf.ericsson.se ([131.160.11.50]) by esealmw128.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 30 Oct 2009 09:35:42 +0100
Received: from nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se [131.160.33.3]) by mail.lmf.ericsson.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3316524B7; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 10:35:42 +0200 (EET)
Received: from nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id F24DD21A22; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 10:35:41 +0200 (EET)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6431621A1F; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 10:35:41 +0200 (EET)
Message-ID: <4AEAA55C.6020401@ericsson.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 10:35:40 +0200
From: Salvatore Loreto <salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090825)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: SM <sm@resistor.net>
References: <4AAB7CCB.9010805@ericsson.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20091029132020.03232b88@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20091029132020.03232b88@resistor.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Oct 2009 08:35:42.0217 (UTC) FILETIME=[F7675F90:01CA593B]
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Cc: hybi@ietf.org
Subject: [hybi] Proposed Charter (rev.3) (W3C WebApps-Whatwg)
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 08:36:23 -0000

SM wrote:
> From the proposal:
>
> "In particular, the working group will liaison with the W3C
> WebApps working group around the WebSockets protocol and the
> requirements to support the WebSocket API; if agreed by both
> parties, the HyBi working group may take on prime responsibility
> on the specification of the WebSockets protocol."
>
> Are the two working group in agreement on who has prime 
> responsibility? I ask as there seems to be some misunderstanding about 
> how work get done within the IETF. BTW, prime responsibility doesn't 
> mean that the two working groups should not work together.
good point.
let me take this chance to ask people from W3C WebApps and Whatwg wgs
if they agree on IETF taking on prime responsibility on the 
specification of the WebSocket protocol,
continuing of course to work together on the draft;
and if they agree, if it clear for them how work get done within the IETF.

thanks for the collaboration
Salvatore