Re: [hybi] The future of WebSockets, and the WiSH proposal

Loïc Hoguin <essen@ninenines.eu> Tue, 25 April 2017 12:17 UTC

Return-Path: <essen@ninenines.eu>
X-Original-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE15C12EC69 for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 05:17:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UTrr5zhZUdqE for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 05:17:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.kundenserver.de (mout.kundenserver.de [217.72.192.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BE3D12EC68 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 05:17:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.28] ([176.149.24.230]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue102 [212.227.15.183]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lh6mt-1cEkSu2sat-00oTTY; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 14:17:03 +0200
To: Andy Green <andy@warmcat.com>
References: <CAH9hSJYpnp0FXt9SsrujJM4OHcXe=pryUtHmM6dmcpgG67hdBw@mail.gmail.com> <CADnb78iPu7ACqZkYJ6SqceE2JNtV+y6M3ojT5PdGmDVoqZHsyQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAH9hSJZk-t-UwOD0jnaKr_M4uoHYwsCKU256ZsKxoVgwuWzxnQ@mail.gmail.com> <20c1e950-2c04-70eb-2372-bc9ba11c2de1@warmcat.com> <CADnb78iboXanrty==75B44AxGH7tCp1_d0yZcAYKKfjKGb0HbQ@mail.gmail.com> <30fe7e5c-fa63-cd49-9143-ae53d444e0bb@ninenines.eu> <4f7f43c3-7dae-19b4-a285-1409f8dd6ac2@warmcat.com> <5c6a07f6-5cc5-3f16-0c99-5cb7bd5e34ce@ninenines.eu> <b8863ce4-793e-39e5-a3a4-0c9f2f76cfb4@warmcat.com>
Cc: "hybi@ietf.org" <hybi@ietf.org>
From: Loïc Hoguin <essen@ninenines.eu>
Organization: Nine Nines
Message-ID: <bb25184a-6d79-6c40-2555-f2e3d8dfaf86@ninenines.eu>
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 14:17:02 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <b8863ce4-793e-39e5-a3a4-0c9f2f76cfb4@warmcat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:hCtZCvCmaIpCMMHCQCHbxHSdGnTqXcQq+gqsycRn81uGSZ9PwRp qwoTrb80kMmLqImDLuO47//kVTiDUG7weaUGb5Nr+F3H9kciyeOUzI543RO+J2MENWoGfDH NXnqLYxOW+FRX9PcqPNHe0q6EOTBPXbGPRhQfQZYiixOrEj7qHNkKwuReIDOj6rzRFHUS34 iW2q9+e3oPZLxg1Us1uXA==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:XLnWkelCcsk=:pcveNyljvsZ2RPlfYUdDjH Ybs7W8Z7nS1t/bUoyrOqR3TaKA7Lsd0TUuHYAFMya2rlzBs7NU20hOw+MkdjZbzeouBJerbRL /73MCfaBx43WbRUwmVRMlS/ZTeGeNE8qgURu4OSFW2LDKEt2Y6/NtKUJ+QRdBN8D7OGiYG0QO rFBPCMv6E1SUKR0A8zc6E63Sz77t4GSt/nMQqQwlwKRYuEFPMkdGdAnfZ4RCJQ1uVuxu9Z05U 607OPS1g1q4hGmlWsBnwfGotRUK2HajfdW98HBiyMY6dk7duQlGrzVhkrsOPtf+z4OibemlkS SXvDYHe3ThbjYn42wPs0QEu7pRkz2Kudiw2IJrmJjT8nrPfV1oMQ4gnC9yNqRgatgaVl4hj3o AawiZzFHV5iLhFn5lwKyLg+cJRPqFKT9TNp6lLP5ymWLiYPHnzUIhGmsmEtv41cX0w8wohVh7 OayX+HxMGzCw8ZbRuCqJVUxp3Y/fPMcYc182V+Y6TEbQg0G+Lj6sJwHdfDu6u2cyX0bkEb/gR GiU39q10ilVwQuRW2giI80lVS9O76uHgHqIWJLVhCfTeBS4F0UBV7kpl7PdEr59AsCqVHz6cV Fe1Our48mfP871JleijHznB2S9UUtwqHBmC2K2RyGmNsSUfdnpLvxV9KWOgVssUEwK0fj21uq HGXZUMzaqTH8TqRJuJCpOcSe2T34+tTB4+1IHBczOo+C/snKnWoCt15xLihNXeWnzPqiMOwnt u0eRluPC8uOLDE2o
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hybi/Ww5eQmGMKc80DyzAThj7Xq_ZpfE>
Subject: Re: [hybi] The future of WebSockets, and the WiSH proposal
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hybi/>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 12:17:13 -0000

On 04/25/2017 02:06 PM, Andy Green wrote:
> Basically I think what you're saying boils down to you want
> ws-over-http/2 (I completely agree that is what is needed), and you
> think http/2 + wish will deliver that.  I already know http/2 will
> deliver 90%+ of it by itself, so no argument here up to the "http/2 +"
> part at least.

Yes.

-- 
Loïc Hoguin
https://ninenines.eu