Re: [hybi] Websocket success rates and TLS extension.

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Sat, 17 April 2010 08:32 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60C6C3A68E0 for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 01:32:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.892
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.892 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.293, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AlxpQRD8Idaw for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 01:32:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 31E793A67FE for <hybi@ietf.org>; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 01:32:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 17 Apr 2010 08:32:10 -0000
Received: from p508FF339.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO [192.168.178.33]) [80.143.243.57] by mail.gmx.net (mp063) with SMTP; 17 Apr 2010 10:32:10 +0200
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18Tpwk08SAT22+SdsgOlknKoe4Z1IpVxvUqizkcQi KECyoQJa7cnSjh
Message-ID: <4BC971F7.5030605@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 10:31:51 +0200
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.8.0.4) Gecko/20060516 Thunderbird/1.5.0.4 Mnenhy/0.7.4.666
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Greg Wilkins <gregw@webtide.com>
References: <4BBAECB7.2030009@webtide.com> <n2j5c902b9e1004170045if1df8e7atf67f926c1452996@mail.gmail.com> <4BC96F43.3030806@webtide.com>
In-Reply-To: <4BC96F43.3030806@webtide.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
X-FuHaFi: 0.68000000000000005
Cc: "hybi@ietf.org" <hybi@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [hybi] Websocket success rates and TLS extension.
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 08:32:22 -0000

On 17.04.2010 10:20, Greg Wilkins wrote:
> ...
> The other idea I had on a similar RTT would be to allow the
> 101 response for an upgrade to contain a body.
>
> This a browser could send
>
>     GET /somethingUseful/andThenUpgrade
>     Upgrade: WebSocket
>
> and the response would return a useful entity, thus not wasting
> a RT, and then upgrade after the response body.
>
> Unfortunately I think this goes beyond the charter of
> the current HTTPbis working group.
> ...

1xx messages only come with headers, right.

But then, can't you just put the payload into a new response header?

Best regards, Julian