Re: [hybi] WAMP RFC Draft Critique
Simone Bordet <simone.bordet@gmail.com> Mon, 05 October 2015 19:31 UTC
Return-Path: <simone.bordet@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 640ED1B42C5 for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Oct 2015 12:31:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X9v5ntsjFN-B for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Oct 2015 12:31:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yk0-x22e.google.com (mail-yk0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1AE8C1B4F33 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Oct 2015 12:31:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ykft14 with SMTP id t14so181822047ykf.0 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 12:31:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=NNEsNp5SXyEOwtpYz2cmP+tS9ZfkavDkrDZ/GJi3OQI=; b=L8jnRSycLJ4X7oND0QRYdziaCKsJ+++UoL5x1/+HKV7QU56l4nHud3OyAF2vxCU+O3 T/cIO6zhtWFlBksaYk/vPGRQh/gYnYdPSPW/6FWwV5cXHy/qVRBE1LBhhWRd71AbQ4BF PsYExi8jK1HY1nXU6N7d+0KzQ2Qw3ms3OA8xyROEXSkAjISNT2B4kAYXLeIYyl1Xaag9 4E42o4Yo4Mh5KdjgjfXnNxIrvvOffpDBdExqr1e0JCekdFfEVfc1ydfGDGuP6mIXlRCx hXMZdgVO26HeilsHykWg+at3WAM5XUapJ41EUMqwBinxRLRUrRAXocWDY7fBkPaU6FyW nTAg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.170.79.194 with SMTP id v185mr26687262ykv.88.1444073477434; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 12:31:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.37.207.196 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Oct 2015 12:31:17 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAH9hSJZw9oMRj3hXTzy8texWr=ZCJNZmOrFqcY-QmMxMX3MHwQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAM70yxD9UQ5ZS6aotOqkq9Fz3Hj5LE8V+b=+hw4goZqY62fP9g@mail.gmail.com> <5612328C.7030401@tavendo.de> <CAH9hSJZw9oMRj3hXTzy8texWr=ZCJNZmOrFqcY-QmMxMX3MHwQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2015 21:31:17 +0200
Message-ID: <CAFWmRJ02wYU8hq9+s_Md5vt0oPTbPwGxRCQa52C84+cpsLf6Qw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Simone Bordet <simone.bordet@gmail.com>
To: Takeshi Yoshino <tyoshino@google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hybi/YQOhm_GiZTlzqJQzYDbAt6YlSAs>
Cc: "hybi@ietf.org" <hybi@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [hybi] WAMP RFC Draft Critique
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hybi/>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2015 19:31:22 -0000
Hi, On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 2:50 PM, Takeshi Yoshino <tyoshino@google.com> wrote: > What I saw on HTTP/2 standardization was: > - pull requests were reviewed and accepted at GitHub. > - the co-editor, Martin, published snapshot at IETF data tracker > periodically. > - questions were raised at the GitHub issue tracker and were taken by the > editor > - but the chair, Mark, guided people to the WG list when non-trivial > discussion happened at GitHub > https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/issues/612#issuecomment-57949294 > > HyBi may also have to follow the 4th point, I guess. Not sure. Actually, Mark changed his mind on this fourth bullet to reduce traffic on that mailing list, so now discussions are on GitHub: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2015OctDec/0027.html -- Simone Bordet http://bordet.blogspot.com --- Finally, no matter how good the architecture and design are, to deliver bug-free software with optimal performance and reliability, the implementation technique must be flawless. Victoria Livschitz
- [hybi] WAMP RFC Draft Critique Emile Cormier
- Re: [hybi] WAMP RFC Draft Critique Tobias Oberstein
- Re: [hybi] WAMP RFC Draft Critique Tobias Oberstein
- Re: [hybi] WAMP RFC Draft Critique Takeshi Yoshino
- Re: [hybi] WAMP RFC Draft Critique Emile Cormier
- Re: [hybi] WAMP RFC Draft Critique Tobias Oberstein
- Re: [hybi] WAMP RFC Draft Critique Simone Bordet
- Re: [hybi] WAMP RFC Draft Critique Emile Cormier
- Re: [hybi] WAMP RFC Draft Critique Tobias Oberstein
- Re: [hybi] WAMP RFC Draft Critique Emile Cormier
- Re: [hybi] WAMP RFC Draft Critique Takeshi Yoshino