Re: [hybi] Last Call: <draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-10.txt> (The WebSocket protocol) to Proposed Standard

John Tamplin <jat@google.com> Sun, 24 July 2011 14:14 UTC

Return-Path: <jat@google.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87DBD21F8828 for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 07:14:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.805
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.805 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.129, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6ylqG7-or72G for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 07:14:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-out.google.com (smtp-out.google.com [216.239.44.51]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E421A21F8557 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 07:14:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wpaz5.hot.corp.google.com (wpaz5.hot.corp.google.com [172.24.198.69]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id p6OEECo3022801 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 07:14:12 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; t=1311516853; bh=aYVuy2IhGD7wBoGitm+MRXyoZEI=; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:References:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=CUeaqgXktrybgRpVcMfxOf4N1YLUFmh8b2h8XVerzQ53uVVvpPv+5oiHXUzBisEPf C+/mnb9ccmx1gW7X2ZJdA==
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=beta; d=google.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=dkim-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date: message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:x-system-of-record; b=c1cUakMRwHxzL1Xxg1heypvr11xVySot5d5NChp9XzW9zpMjmbq6Tu18YI3fLmkC3 IJ/MQdzOKKvKmu+ICamrA==
Received: from gyf3 (gyf3.prod.google.com [10.243.50.67]) by wpaz5.hot.corp.google.com with ESMTP id p6OEEBxe003708 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for <hybi@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 07:14:12 -0700
Received: by gyf3 with SMTP id 3so2264767gyf.13 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 07:14:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=KIS+Kxe+KPw4OiUjh+QyHlNN7qHwItBr2IKiZw+MGYk=; b=dFESmfm0/xLkEcpduM6+uhFq7wfOQBhH3roMwP2j9AHqpsjh1hqAgNvSGj+FntpmlI I3szMMtAhDr7/09qRt1Q==
Received: by 10.150.74.7 with SMTP id w7mr3400053yba.116.1311516851511; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 07:14:11 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.150.49.7 with HTTP; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 07:13:50 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CALiegfnwNyYDy=SyrqHJXV0ZreADb7F8QySvgdHofW9Hm9miZQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20110711140229.17432.23519.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CALiegfk0zVVRBbOP4ugsVXKmcLnryujP6DZqF6Bu_dC2C3PpeQ@mail.gmail.com> <9031.1311082001.631622@puncture> <CALiegfk_GLAhAf=yEe6hYw2bwtxEwg9aJN+f0Bm9he5QgsRavA@mail.gmail.com> <CAP992=Ft6NwG+rbcuWUP0npwVNHY_znHmXmznBQO_krMo3RT6g@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegfmTWMP3GhS1-k2aoHHXkUkB+eWqV=2+BufuWVR1s2Z-EA@mail.gmail.com> <20110721163910.GA16854@1wt.eu> <CAP992=FrX5VxP2o0JLNoJs8nXXba7wbZ6RN9wBUYC0ZSN_wbAg@mail.gmail.com> <9031.1311270000.588511@puncture> <CALiegf=pYzybvc7WB2QfPg6FKrhLxgzHuP-DpuuMfZYJV6Z7FQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAP992=FJymFPKcPVWrF-LkcEtNUz=Kt9L_ex+kLtjiGjL1T46w@mail.gmail.com> <4E28A51F.4020704@callenish.com> <9031.1311286867.939466@puncture> <4E28BA9D.6010501@callenish.com> <CAP992=GedTEfimykCWwdwm=BsZdwFRJO36EO0a_o7iejURJ+tQ@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegfnwNyYDy=SyrqHJXV0ZreADb7F8QySvgdHofW9Hm9miZQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: John Tamplin <jat@google.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 10:13:50 -0400
Message-ID: <CABLsOLCgxDNDs54GUybBzmG8a6rNPzXzFcwf_OU25j5L+AobaQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: =?UTF-8?Q?I=C3=B1aki_Baz_Castillo?= <ibc@aliax.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd5c4be0d216204a8d150a3
X-System-Of-Record: true
Cc: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi@ietf.org>, IETF-Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [hybi] Last Call: <draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-10.txt> (The WebSocket protocol) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 14:14:14 -0000

On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 7:11 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> wrote:

> 2011/7/22 David Endicott <dendicott@gmail.com>om>:
> > The technological advantages are worthy, when it's used, but when it
> doesn't
> > come into play, there are added inefficiencies.
>
> ~100 ms (if the DNS server is not local and there is no DNS cache for
> the given domain). And just during the WS connection, no more. Taking
> into account that a WS will be *usually* connected after loading a web
> page, such ~100ms in a non-full-realtime protocol is insignificant.


Wait, are you really saying that 100ms connect latency is unimportant?

-- 
John A. Tamplin
Software Engineer (GWT), Google