IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hybi] Issue tracker

Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> Thu, 13 May 2010 10:45 UTC

Return-Path: <mjs@apple.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D00713A6C9B for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 May 2010 03:45:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.67
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.67 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.929, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HdwEALB6KzIx for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 May 2010 03:45:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-out3.apple.com (mail-out3.apple.com [17.254.13.22]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95CCC3A6C9D for <hybi@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 May 2010 03:37:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay16.apple.com (relay16.apple.com [17.128.113.55]) by mail-out3.apple.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27A2F9279C27 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 May 2010 03:37:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: 11807137-b7c23ae000001561-36-4bebd674f79c
Received: from gertie.apple.com (gertie.apple.com [17.151.62.15]) by relay16.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id FF.58.05473.576DBEB4; Thu, 13 May 2010 03:37:41 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Received: from [10.0.1.6] (c-69-181-42-237.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [69.181.42.237]) by gertie.apple.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-7.04 (built Sep 26 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0L2C000CDTISNG50@gertie.apple.com> for hybi@ietf.org; Thu, 13 May 2010 03:37:40 -0700 (PDT)
From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
In-reply-to: <4BEBC7FF.6050401@ericsson.com>
Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 03:37:39 -0700
Message-id: <F02F10EE-9132-4F95-B79A-775433AB3A8B@apple.com>
References: <4BEA99E9.5050308@ericsson.com> <20100512165946.GC19314@shareable.org> <4BEAF8F6.80709@ericsson.com> <EE063503-C00D-4718-BB8A-8F00928241F6@apple.com> <4BEBC7FF.6050401@ericsson.com>
To: Salvatore Loreto <salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1078)
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAZE=
Cc: "hybi@ietf.org" <hybi@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [hybi] Issue tracker
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 10:45:06 -0000

On May 13, 2010, at 2:35 AM, Salvatore Loreto wrote:

> Hi Maciej,
> 
> as I have written in my first mail this is an experiment, and as such it can be changed based on feedback.
> However we would like to go this way for the time being, to see how this work.

My feedback is to please let anyone raise an issue. At the very least you should let document editors raise issues.

I also don't think "this is an experiment" is a good reason to make issue raising overly restricted. What problem are we trying to solve? How will we know if the experiment in severely restricting issue raising is a success?

Regards,
Maciej

v2.34.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status