Re: [hybi] deflate-stream vs. frame-by-frame

Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> Wed, 22 June 2011 13:54 UTC

Return-Path: <ibc@aliax.net>
X-Original-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 441B511E808D for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 06:54:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.664
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.664 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.013, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zaqp201Q+GNb for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 06:54:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qw0-f44.google.com (mail-qw0-f44.google.com [209.85.216.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4A221F0C44 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 06:54:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qwc23 with SMTP id 23so579927qwc.31 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 06:54:35 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.115.21 with SMTP id g21mr506855qcq.230.1308750875019; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 06:54:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.181.209 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 06:54:34 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20110622060058.ef1fc80126c74c6c202a919c41c7bb0b.24a5465d55.wbe@email03.secureserver.net>
References: <20110622060058.ef1fc80126c74c6c202a919c41c7bb0b.24a5465d55.wbe@email03.secureserver.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:54:34 +0200
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=9mKTRWd=FnDECohbrFCoQ95LhOA@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?I=C3=B1aki_Baz_Castillo?= <ibc@aliax.net>
To: Bob Gezelter <gezelter@rlgsc.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: hybi@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [hybi] deflate-stream vs. frame-by-frame
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:54:36 -0000

2011/6/22 Bob Gezelter <gezelter@rlgsc.com>om>:
> First, there is the question of compression and masking. Compressing
> masked text is of dubious utility, efficacy, and efficiency. Masking
> tends to randomize text, random text is a poor candidate for compression
> (in some cases, attempting to compress random text can actually cause
> the "compressed" text to be larger than the original text). Taken solely
> on this basis, ANY compression should precede masking.

I expect this is obvious for everyone (or should be). Will not WS
draft be adapted to fulfill this obvious reality?

-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>