IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hybi] Multiplexing extension spec draft 03

John Tamplin <jat@google.com> Tue, 28 February 2012 20:00 UTC

Return-Path: <jat@google.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CDD121E8051 for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:00:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.976
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.976 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Po378Mp9upbw for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:00:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vw0-f44.google.com (mail-vw0-f44.google.com [209.85.212.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 085A221E8063 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:00:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by vbbez10 with SMTP id ez10so2667177vbb.31 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:00:49 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jat@google.com designates 10.52.19.196 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.52.19.196;
Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jat@google.com designates 10.52.19.196 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jat@google.com; dkim=pass header.i=jat@google.com
Received: from mr.google.com ([10.52.19.196]) by 10.52.19.196 with SMTP id h4mr14175037vde.91.1330459249085 (num_hops = 1); Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:00:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:x-system-of-record; bh=ZVb0DrCt6sV0J0Upo+mTNOlGTI1UVB/oHELuqqaZg4U=; b=OC/qP313FWfoMAH7URIj2f9PtFPas9zxO/oSbG41KRhMWF0abP+HnzHEG5INFlzrMI pr8kZM3XDiv28Uy8CW7xze68qyvLqL0YB7vtDcv96nB9TGvOEWWtLzPw/S9KYc9B+d25 HpKDMHBKS87ZBt4tC5BCBJU07+oUcK2ayPdIQ=
Received: by 10.52.19.196 with SMTP id h4mr11784262vde.91.1330459248764; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:00:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.52.19.196 with SMTP id h4mr11784251vde.91.1330459248670; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:00:48 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.117.132 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:00:28 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <634914A010D0B943A035D226786325D42D5992F87A@EXVMBX020-12.exch020.serverdata.net>
References: <CAH9hSJb1ewPO3EBgD78anD+=4XouToGR4X7C1wvWqonc2nYB6g@mail.gmail.com> <634914A010D0B943A035D226786325D42D5992F76E@EXVMBX020-12.exch020.serverdata.net> <CAH9hSJbd2MrqABaX+fme0MEpPSKtwJNtxyi_iz3RNnEx1a6Mvw@mail.gmail.com> <634914A010D0B943A035D226786325D42D5992F87A@EXVMBX020-12.exch020.serverdata.net>
From: John Tamplin <jat@google.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:00:28 -0500
Message-ID: <CABLsOLDtXWa5oeQND3yMBmZWsfS36m5jMKzYYJp2iTN7fTEB6w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tobias Oberstein <tobias.oberstein@tavendo.de>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="20cf307ca01ae7b93604ba0bae14"
X-System-Of-Record: true
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlDeS4v9XbfH+zfikextXKlJllc8rajqumEaEExavzZpFLnZt6GWzimzA+6O5rQgxmUPsClZb4YPMRQw2wLanB+tDNhsPinDuQZsfz7lUXkJ+6Rjd3KFkMumgwjPKdi96CjySDm
Cc: "hybi@ietf.org" <hybi@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [hybi] Multiplexing extension spec draft 03
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 20:00:54 -0000

On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Tobias Oberstein <
tobias.oberstein@tavendo.de> wrote:

> I was wondering whether _outside_ of WS, there is a case with HTTP headers
> where order is significant.
>

Isn't Accept-Encoding/etc sensitive to the order (in the case of equal q
values)?

-- 
John A. Tamplin
Software Engineer (GWT), Google

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email