IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hybi] Call for interest: multiplexing dedicated for WebSocket

Takeshi Yoshino <tyoshino@google.com> Mon, 27 May 2013 08:35 UTC

Return-Path: <tyoshino@google.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F4FD21F8C03 for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 May 2013 01:35:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CH8mY32Regqc for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 May 2013 01:35:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x232.google.com (mail-wi0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::232]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD3E121F89D5 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 May 2013 01:35:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wi0-f178.google.com with SMTP id hj6so1349084wib.11 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 May 2013 01:35:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=HTul8iR8c+Dht2j8/IQVhRYOKzKn/EPsRf8sr1ocQLc=; b=cRJJz2WIYuUC4CSyVTCrAldiuXto1n3XCECdA2UJ7n97cNp73DF57iW4ZCx5um2Nd2 kr85moZT0/3OeoIZ+er+/J09vPszQfAWSHFIyhxs7tBNw1iI6v91BTNZ7im0VHN0wZV/ H+/gJaJgHavrZ2uHGVeBH8YriZbK6rXCnFi0tfA8DNpX0Bes9VW+k/y5wvVNl+uc4x+Z YLgpDnyBCRRuy+y08gA9rPbZfgfCGISEHLhMW9hYHq8wxo8Cqq8c3/d4Y093o2aKSHnz 9FVszapYKqgDNDBF2GX3YaTJhDbJDkdmcOwB/uOLLH9MhVdTLIu9aYKXIbT5TviJ3U5G 3A1Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=HTul8iR8c+Dht2j8/IQVhRYOKzKn/EPsRf8sr1ocQLc=; b=lLDNyqBltfroAqXPpqqkQfZk1woEUg9IIAjTi3JbbJZw6sVRMzruvWBxugpZWH+Vdm d7aOVCaOIQVvKgFenxJWcd5uE9oPPKmyyJa4g2141G4KpXH0Eq92M0ph+RaalYHjFfCr jA4EwgRQjPSd/2YQgm37MEBLv6wTj3u5w0PbEAf5vxTWe4yUbILu5A6i4MClelvHObxz W1BnvBHT6An1000o0xOlyfSQMPDTNaUD1Ao1PkLnczj9k80xOgm8t8mB03MJ69hLS4Qa UoYdZktPCAPDxrYs6dqYok8JPAlV7f2shUycu4qR34PJgwnUrYjQNvQJ9SfUPTudN2sC XpZQ==
X-Received: by 10.180.184.112 with SMTP id et16mr7471050wic.58.1369643701966; Mon, 27 May 2013 01:35:01 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.180.5.136 with HTTP; Mon, 27 May 2013 01:34:41 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <519D2F3E.3000609@tavendo.de>
References: <CAH9hSJZxr+aG7GZa4f-dUOTGj4bnJ+3XxivUX4jei5CMyqN4LQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAH9hSJZUG1f+3Uk=t2=A5i4O9=wPvAisspM=pgmGEH9emTL9-Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAH9hSJZai_UuxW4O6mZcEJT2DJoURtLo16XNci1qkYVWv4HVdg@mail.gmail.com> <007501ce56f0$67f74080$37e5c180$@noemax.com> <519CD6A1.7080708@ericsson.com> <519CE075.4000106@tavendo.de> <CAM5k6X9WmO80hiQZ6_GqK66PAd3of=2ZRi9=VrWj52apA1+=5g@mail.gmail.com> <CAFWmRJ2Hbe0x5FeV2T7Gkp3WEsxQHe2=YPBTgvHYLcus3A4rBQ@mail.gmail.com> <519D2F3E.3000609@tavendo.de>
From: Takeshi Yoshino <tyoshino@google.com>
Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 17:34:41 +0900
Message-ID: <CAH9hSJbRc1E1+nbFQ5su+R=0ya6AeOuoK-i5Ud1=4dsV63Vr8w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tobias Oberstein <tobias.oberstein@tavendo.de>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c2269a532d8504ddaf06eb
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnxlyVeLEncMf6lRZM8MVMcwmdfxg4zg9U/GElpFZxyoduf6ikwud2zXiFI+OqNoHdDUr8uSe7QP2sficQ//+uhf8/OYYmklzQU5R6QuOO7vVxn1kH98yVxL+20UKctGPojzGpzMQCXqTbOULLcnN36Q+74sIwNrZ8+MXuFeU4cqzaA8Gr8JTz3/Ie3wPd9TMwPLH5Z
Cc: Simone Bordet <sbordet@intalio.com>, "hybi@ietf.org" <hybi@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [hybi] Call for interest: multiplexing dedicated for WebSocket
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 08:35:03 -0000

On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 5:49 AM, Tobias Oberstein <
tobias.oberstein@tavendo.de> wrote:

> The current mux RFC reads:
>
> " The sender MUST use a fair mechanism for selecting which logical
> channel's data to send in the next WebSocket message.  Simple
> implementations may choose a round-robin scheduler, while more
> advanced implementations may adjust priority based on the amount
> or frequency of data sent by each logical channel.
> "
>
> This seems to imply that the app has no control over QoS per stream (i.e.
> "chatty" vs "mass data").
>
> IMHO the app should be able to control that (ultimately effecting buffer
> sizes and priorization/scheduling). If the app has no control chances are
> that people will invent something at the app level. IOW: this is something
> where MUX could really deliver added value (better UX), even if you are not
> a big G and concerned about infrastructure resource costs and world scale
> apps.
>

I'll fix the text. It was written considering only environments that runs
scripts without any knowledge about them such as importance, dependency,
etc.

v2.8.10 | Report a Bug | By Email