[hybi] -05 suggested rewrite for Section 1.8
"Pat McManus @Mozilla" <mcmanus@ducksong.com> Fri, 11 February 2011 17:01 UTC
Return-Path: <mcmanus@ducksong.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C7CB3A6A2C for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 09:01:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KbG4OOqlN7PJ for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 09:01:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from linode.ducksong.com (linode.ducksong.com [64.22.125.164]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 539903A69D2 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 09:01:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by linode.ducksong.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9CC0F102A8; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 12:01:52 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [192.168.16.226] (cpe-67-253-92-25.maine.res.rr.com [67.253.92.25]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by linode.ducksong.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6FBD510157 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 12:01:47 -0500 (EST)
From: "Pat McManus @Mozilla" <mcmanus@ducksong.com>
To: hybi <hybi@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 12:00:48 -0500
Message-ID: <1297443648.2401.143.camel@ds9.ducksong.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [hybi] -05 suggested rewrite for Section 1.8
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 17:01:38 -0000
Section 1.8: I suggest striking all of this text: "There are several options for establishing a WebSocket connection. On the face of it, the simplest method would seem to be to use port 80 to get a direct connection to a WebSocket server. Port 80 traffic, however, will often be intercepted by HTTP proxies, which can lead to the connection failing to be established. The most reliable method, therefore, is to use TLS encryption and port 443 to connect directly to a WebSocket server. This has the advantage of being more secure; however, TLS encryption can be computationally expensive." This doesn't actually help with interop, is only contextually true, and is the kind of statement that does not hold up well over time. The spec is simply better without the text because it isn't adding useful at the protocol level. -- http://www.getfirefox.com/
- [hybi] -05 suggested rewrite for Section 1.8 Pat McManus @Mozilla
- Re: [hybi] -05 suggested rewrite for Section 1.8 Salvatore Loreto