Re: [hybi] Call for interest: multiplexing dedicated for WebSocket

Takeshi Yoshino <tyoshino@google.com> Mon, 27 May 2013 09:03 UTC

Return-Path: <tyoshino@google.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3579A21F90EF for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 May 2013 02:03:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mlDvWGVezlHS for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 May 2013 02:03:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ea0-x231.google.com (mail-ea0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4013:c01::231]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FC8421F90AC for <hybi@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 May 2013 02:03:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ea0-f177.google.com with SMTP id q14so3751251eaj.8 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 May 2013 02:03:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=b1KCcCPvswmrKB/dCaQzqUsCthKx0p8ZeWm08tl8w1o=; b=cnRfNKjJQIKryOrfKeMbBe6toPzRP3nxS2bZpuMwMw0NWi3hgJOSzGS2V7/YdycJox 4jxAHVYy0fz9PoWMPLaiwahcfF+vfqLjcK8OdMQhlnLhFQJ6Ukph7ckg7M06SRoiM4XQ ErevSQrUOEuroHX/DcwDsvQtj05fMOoZ2G0a78oX8IFBD0r1bXsZ5zNscIopRC8K9TsU 0NRuWybAmVqeix6z0mijJIOQzHTeLZToen5rr70pWRA2V1J/Ckj5UucA1/BqDOIyco3Z NJtw9C/c/MZHU+5MqwIcRD/6DO1K8gVhFt9qU+v79LNJDmrXnDhxnwJcx6CVo+HUByzc JmpQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=b1KCcCPvswmrKB/dCaQzqUsCthKx0p8ZeWm08tl8w1o=; b=GhXOc345RVQVf8Fi6dnd21yQ0Kc5TGtQ6Cip5dgSUuJ4IEDINrDN+kfEdQz7aAH2MP Alz/p4lG8opa3zSv9RQb7JowQFzmMNt0O23yxfW4yG2NBSfpButTCgRE4F6rSUSaIe+t Fb8v/luRCPdCnE23MzGNyiyUaOtmQOvbaEKP/SrEZc+YvLs4S13j0J36VkWZuj88G/mS jvpQZYhOhhEqBTh9CeSjQU9ZApADli1VTgVOYlKkhkb/1NpuKKDmYP/yI0H7/Kbbw+Sg 0X7rFrPofYEtf6UKxkxIPyFbWdBEo967gCNXuslSimBJivnxtVsWW34LsNGSglRjkDsB yBug==
X-Received: by 10.14.178.134 with SMTP id f6mr9225704eem.129.1369645419565; Mon, 27 May 2013 02:03:39 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.86.67 with HTTP; Mon, 27 May 2013 02:03:19 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAFWmRJ2M0Gtoz80+6v+=0Ldm9+xE2brqD2shVcBPuNz+QGiKHg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAH9hSJZxr+aG7GZa4f-dUOTGj4bnJ+3XxivUX4jei5CMyqN4LQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAH9hSJZUG1f+3Uk=t2=A5i4O9=wPvAisspM=pgmGEH9emTL9-Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAH9hSJZai_UuxW4O6mZcEJT2DJoURtLo16XNci1qkYVWv4HVdg@mail.gmail.com> <007501ce56f0$67f74080$37e5c180$@noemax.com> <519CD6A1.7080708@ericsson.com> <519CE075.4000106@tavendo.de> <CAM5k6X9WmO80hiQZ6_GqK66PAd3of=2ZRi9=VrWj52apA1+=5g@mail.gmail.com> <CAFWmRJ2Hbe0x5FeV2T7Gkp3WEsxQHe2=YPBTgvHYLcus3A4rBQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAH9hSJYOPvsFPDXLOa29ASd8xavLdvfRK_cVd=Uc=Vaydz1O=w@mail.gmail.com> <CAFWmRJ2M0Gtoz80+6v+=0Ldm9+xE2brqD2shVcBPuNz+QGiKHg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Takeshi Yoshino <tyoshino@google.com>
Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 18:03:19 +0900
Message-ID: <CAH9hSJb6FJK3qYENDXMKV8_s+Vv8b6SRnqjEaZnWUUBu6EuOkg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Simone Bordet <sbordet@intalio.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b6242c0b3e09404ddaf6cad"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkb6cPwb/otAQmRHfjFUUuExzzKG7EUfc7jnWPcGtl/Du67OqCFpqQKSFMc/B3NrbQyzMa+sY+Zlnj/Omb9BtI8n7h761L7KtkhXYuF1ydMX8OhiGcbPLW4N4oVJsgeOc13Kj47zP0xrRm0n0X7Nv1sl8BLbNyPJqiemAEJFonBmc5qvpAz08eZ6FQFBcX04cDi9VEC
Cc: "hybi@ietf.org" <hybi@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [hybi] Call for interest: multiplexing dedicated for WebSocket
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 09:03:41 -0000

On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Simone Bordet <sbordet@intalio.com> wrote:

> > Different from HTTP/2.0's case, we don't need to provide a special field
> in
> > mux protocol to pass priority, I think.
>
> Sure, but then you force every application to reinvent this mechanism
> on top of WebSocket mux.
> At that point, one could argue that application messages could have
> their own "channel_id" in their messages, and applications can do mux
> themselves, if they need it.


Oh, ... good point.

If there gonna be inter-app prioritization (then load balancer would want
to look at ToS), frequent priority change (performance matters. better than
JS level processing), and wide adoption of priority (standardized method is
preferred), right.