IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hybi] Websockets sub-protocol registry

Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 21 March 2016 15:55 UTC

Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 934E012D8F9 for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 08:55:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HBcnfsfcCZZD for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 08:55:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x230.google.com (mail-oi0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EAB312D8F6 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 08:54:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x230.google.com with SMTP id w20so88522793oia.2 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 08:54:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=lpZ8FSO2kGLp5QphaOBSFd2SjuRqwoU2IqDoQ4oJ2Ac=; b=cX7oAu405jn2+oPV+em58KR17WTnhgfBwMIHDQwvdncKM2BSHcMi1fAAW5frjKiNkT 3+48B+fIZcoaFTC5M9aUjAKll0AvhBDxrkpGHL8p2BYckCOm6+ieo16+jXF0wjFtD7Y6 t5KfB/coEtd1LEOd7Gl5Hq/DJQnT2F/xJJnZWGSGcNoni9ymyYi42pOWONjORrXPibqN DqIbquuCaYAcXrcFsK1FVclhtbp2FB4T1iLmuHhrPt8zQXyjbye3yNb91+JEv5uBfNAa q3tQ1lRm7KVms0AXajIER7gjpmlwv/qOCgWReIiSkmK6kEKMRS7Ihheh7wytLKCg6Y8M 2HpA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=lpZ8FSO2kGLp5QphaOBSFd2SjuRqwoU2IqDoQ4oJ2Ac=; b=AF2aS14Ad2Ib701Dt0jcDv6pHpqo3sF2YcDlRI7XVD10kwAuaZJhMJJJ6qT5g1z3Zi wDM67xB543AttgoKatyq7txYnJydOKnPqUCgSdly6A+Cn3yF8I55LnuL7jfh+NQkTi3e qM8cjWegOf/tnaam8xNU9sUvOLZ6vBOcqBS/IzTm96ayMoB7QZNIZuaDXe1l4ikL0yfa zqAMk9TiRozph+9z0rN0GPYscEr9lUjAs9Kce1qH6YsRmyJO3SYUd01ubkfCTyHpjBEl diaCu/StOuxvhCbtwtUo7B4ApIM23E4mGQxlCHEmMEzKcbEIMMsojfTDDKeLsHqWJmoH DM5w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJL7n9tb250DkkCkpqyYKYegFjtOObqzoxyOSkDV2kDXg5GMog46HoVOq9lw5sakgTnENvEOmFaAVCpsXw==
X-Received: by 10.157.38.233 with SMTP id i38mr1064295otd.12.1458575683714; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 08:54:43 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.157.51.6 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 08:54:24 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <56EC0A26.1070107@isode.com>
References: <CA+9kkMDZQ_dPM76HaAKwvsRaOhdyvbQd+YLOCTR9piBYO2Kt+w@mail.gmail.com> <CADnb78gBkzjhVRQgzF29hNq4LsCZ=vSu4CJSM9nDWuLVcsOzDw@mail.gmail.com> <CA+9kkMCriEjDrs0Fpb-6QGcuZLWX37xVTBo6wk1Zq9cBSRMTxw@mail.gmail.com> <CADnb78iuJ=F=uhOTfyKx7mnH6wtpN6Pjqa2w2sQ7ZCbdULU_rw@mail.gmail.com> <CA+9kkMA5gHqd9QgfOseowEuFsE=sp8yjcUDa+6A06rQg650Jvw@mail.gmail.com> <56E6E454.7090207@gmx.de> <CA+9kkMCPkZcaM6xF0ctkhnz+Uju0WNj24pJ+-+VUqgkRy0BEjw@mail.gmail.com> <56EC0A26.1070107@isode.com>
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 08:54:24 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMAeJ7g_vizZwWnAXCeEA19DksEOhAOfzo14XM8uPMpgwg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113cfb72818673052e911d35"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hybi/ab6oUOwN_jmZFdU__MAh16bfIjA>
Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [hybi] Websockets sub-protocol registry
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hybi/>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 15:55:22 -0000

On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 7:01 AM, Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
wrote:

> Hi Ted,
>
>
>
> We can either put that in the RTCWEB draft, a short draft updating just
> the registration portion of RFC 6445,
>
> I slightly prefer the latter, but the former would be Ok.
>

There's a 00 shot at this in
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hardie-rfc6455-iana-clarification/ .

I'm not sure what status to aim it at; BCP is probably wrong, but also easy
to fix.  Suggestions for that or other changes welcome.

Ted

> or possibly even in an accepted erratum.
>
> We can do that as well. Although I would rather the erratum not being the
> only source of information on this.
>
> If it were an accepted erratum for RFC 6445, we would likely still want to
> include something in the RTCWEB docs noting that those were the rules (but
> not having that doc update the RFC.)
>
> Any thoughts on that approach?
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email