Re: [hybi] Redesigning the Web Socket handshake

Francis Brosnan Blázquez <francis@aspl.es> Tue, 02 February 2010 21:36 UTC

Return-Path: <francis@aspl.es>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DF323A6972 for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 13:36:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.584
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.584 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_HOST_ALMOST_IP=1.889, HOST_EQ_STATIC=1.172, HOST_EQ_STATICIP=1.511, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t-gavFXeYZ-C for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 13:36:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.aspl.es (196.Red-212-170-101.staticIP.rima-tde.net [212.170.101.196]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC92B3A6950 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 13:36:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.aspl.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1F641170005; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 22:36:47 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at aspl.es
Received: from mail.aspl.es ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dolphin.aspl.es [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jSjEGXDtZbSs; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 22:36:47 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.0.153] (85.Red-79-152-123.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [79.152.123.85]) (Authenticated sender: acinom) by mail.aspl.es (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C2FC31170001; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 22:36:46 +0100 (CET)
From: Francis Brosnan Blázquez <francis@aspl.es>
To: Greg Wilkins <gregw@webtide.com>
In-Reply-To: <4B679E2C.2080502@webtide.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1002012305000.21600@ps20323.dreamhostps.com> <4B676E8C.70804@webtide.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1002020311030.3846@ps20323.dreamhostps.com> <4B679E2C.2080502@webtide.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15"
Organization: ASPL
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 22:37:07 +0100
Message-Id: <1265146627.19627.52.camel@tot.local>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: hybi@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [hybi] Redesigning the Web Socket handshake
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 21:36:12 -0000

Hi Greg,

> you are not listening to the server side developers.

Please don't fall into using "server side developers" where you really
want to say server side HTTP developers...

> Apache is telling you that they can't share port 80
> with websocket and you're giving them nothing back!
> 
> For many of us, we are already "near the HTTP spec" and
> it's full rules and we've already dealt with the complications.
> It is your attempt to simplify HTTP that is causing the
> complications.

Not all server side developers interested in Websocket are working with
HTTP servers/products...
-- 
Francis Brosnan Blázquez <francis@aspl.es>
ASPL