Re: [hybi] Moving to a CONNECT-based handshake

Ian Fette (イアンフェッティ) <ifette@google.com> Tue, 30 November 2010 18:38 UTC

Return-Path: <ifette@google.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB8E63A6C04 for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 10:38:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -109.926
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-109.926 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.250, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id icPoMASnqyIn for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 10:38:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp-out.google.com (smtp-out.google.com [74.125.121.35]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C96D3A6B3D for <hybi@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 10:38:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from kpbe12.cbf.corp.google.com (kpbe12.cbf.corp.google.com [172.25.105.76]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id oAUIdFwv028820 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 10:39:16 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; t=1291142356; bh=XMdRHUQ8lCQQDMTQfMKdmk4KbD8=; h=MIME-Version:Reply-To:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: Subject:From:To:Cc:Content-Type; b=bnFww1rWMqsaYkgQ8SM+f7COVimZ+Aa2waVoVasygYIfbWPI5eBjMnO1TJ56XurWr gl0VcjBY18w+GO23lCPXA==
Received: from yxm8 (yxm8.prod.google.com [10.190.4.8]) by kpbe12.cbf.corp.google.com with ESMTP id oAUId4vE002560 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 10:39:14 -0800
Received: by yxm8 with SMTP id 8so3146463yxm.21 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 10:39:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:reply-to :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; bh=sFQFcOdlyZ32dQ4IpZkQfa1u5TuRNQC2MPoKbzOmRW4=; b=fCVvEECALlkQfU1O1/xPxl0SSIaognvGa6+28gx/GZfj81l/0RztS6ZgzkWsKTIwJK onVqa9OeGJbiuxdPSkQw==
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=google.com; s=beta; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=KCeENFGV3McYM/Arvn8XN5YTKD9lJF4OuAFCDNbb3nSUm+DAjlHYuWHQ161YWsWx40 4dsGBEzxznAiUiGJj0fg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.231.19.136 with SMTP id a8mr7754581ibb.6.1291142353634; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 10:39:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.231.37.194 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 10:39:13 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <BB31C4AB95A70042A256109D4619912605790190@XCH117CNC.rim.net>
References: <op.vmzqkhszidj3kv@simon-pieterss-macbook.local> <4CF52558.9010100@gmx.de> <4CF529FF.9080708@opera.com> <BB31C4AB95A70042A256109D4619912605790150@XCH117CNC.rim.net> <AANLkTimzTvtho0m9HZSe6exgSwZxbCnxtmeJd2-G0aSK@mail.gmail.com> <BB31C4AB95A70042A256109D4619912605790178@XCH117CNC.rim.net> <BB31C4AB95A70042A256109D4619912605790190@XCH117CNC.rim.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 10:39:13 -0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTimQJz22RtoVnB16C8Mi4C8=QKB946wSR9BRsP85@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Ian Fette (イアンフェッティ)" <ifette@google.com>
To: Joe Mason <jmason@rim.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00221534d72757e8fc049649815f"
X-System-Of-Record: true
Cc: "hybi@ietf.org" <hybi@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [hybi] Moving to a CONNECT-based handshake
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ifette@google.com
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 18:38:06 -0000

So, can we make a decision? CCing Joe and Sal, I would like to see a call
for consensus.

On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 10:31 AM, Joe Mason <jmason@rim.com> wrote:

> > As I said, we’re hoping not to have to ship it.  But if the discussion
> > drags on without producing another candidate for much longer, -00 will
> > remain the de facto standard, officially obsolete or not.
>
> I should also mention, after seeing Adam's paper, we may decide not to
> throw the switch on -00 after all even if -03+new handshake isn't ready.
>  But our plan in that case will still be -03+new handshake or nothing.
>
> Joe
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential
> information, privileged material (including material protected by the
> solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public
> information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended
> recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error,
> please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your
> system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this
> transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.
> _______________________________________________
> hybi mailing list
> hybi@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi
>