IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hybi] method of allocation of reserved bits to extensions

Gabriel Montenegro <Gabriel.Montenegro@microsoft.com> Fri, 27 May 2011 01:03 UTC

Return-Path: <Gabriel.Montenegro@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61528E06A5 for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 May 2011 18:03:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.539
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.539 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.060, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SCAhiOSp4U3Z for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 May 2011 18:03:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.microsoft.com (mailb.microsoft.com [131.107.115.215]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF470E0697 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 May 2011 18:03:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from TK5EX14MLTC101.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.79.178) by TK5-EXGWY-E802.partners.extranet.microsoft.com (10.251.56.168) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.176.0; Thu, 26 May 2011 18:03:27 -0700
Received: from TK5EX14MLTW652.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com (157.54.71.68) by TK5EX14MLTC101.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.79.178) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.289.8; Thu, 26 May 2011 18:03:26 -0700
Received: from TK5EX14MBXW603.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com ([169.254.3.209]) by TK5EX14MLTW652.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com ([157.54.71.68]) with mapi id 14.01.0289.008; Thu, 26 May 2011 18:03:26 -0700
From: Gabriel Montenegro <Gabriel.Montenegro@microsoft.com>
To: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>, Salvatore Loreto <salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com>
Thread-Topic: [hybi] method of allocation of reserved bits to extensions
Thread-Index: AQHMGqhX1u9834hjukKLiEqBfS9wQZSfy14AgABdLgD//7WU4A==
Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 01:03:26 +0000
Message-ID: <CA566BAEAD6B3F4E8B5C5C4F61710C11402F368D@TK5EX14MBXW603.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
References: <BANLkTi=vOQDtL5GobitKe8yiUoQFb2go_Q@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTikaOXg0u+4d8Ly6OxUQ7PFUU=udgQ@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTikiUkivJitZGU-+q6wBfJ3VW45F8g@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTindmLQ0KE6K5qUX2ue+=hoLUaznLA@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTim9w83iSY-TH1yuVAUXxypJk_tmrw@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTimnMBwNgP_e29exT6dUkp60s2xU3g@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTi==RTfqaYFT3CQs1pM5Tb501rk2Vg@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTinqQiMQ4N1vWjyCe682BmdisW-=KA@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTik1a6CEA8LiiLgsnBt9qHCaybmWfg@mail.gmail.com> <4DBA3809.4010004@oracle.com> <CA566BAEAD6B3F4E8B5C5C4F61710C11402DB23F@TK5EX14MBXW603.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20110524234152.03017c30@resistor.net> <4DDE85EC.2010001@ericsson.com> <BANLkTimHmTWCpigP-nhCSqNMxiGade292w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTimHmTWCpigP-nhCSqNMxiGade292w@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [157.54.51.41]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "hybi@ietf.org" <hybi@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [hybi] method of allocation of reserved bits to extensions
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 01:03:28 -0000

No need for such language. "Standards action" IANA policy is enough in addition to the wording already in 07.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: hybi-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:hybi-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Greg
> Wilkins
> Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2011 15:29
> To: Salvatore Loreto
> Cc: hybi@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [hybi] method of allocation of reserved bits to extensions
> 
> On 27 May 2011 02:55, Salvatore Loreto <salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com>
> wrote:
> > After discussion with Gabriel,
> > taking in consideration the long mail discussion and different
> > positions on this topic, we have decided that a IANA strict assignment
> > policy is the right way to handle the allocation of reserved bits
> 
> OK,  but can we add some text to the specification saying  that
> experimental/proprietary extensions must not squat on opcodes/bits pending
> IANA allocation, but instead put them in the payload until such as they are
> allocated opcodes/bits.
> 
> cheers
> _______________________________________________
> hybi mailing list
> hybi@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email