Re: [hybi] Proposed Charter for HyBi WG (rev.3)

Salvatore Loreto <salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com> Fri, 30 October 2009 10:20 UTC

Return-Path: <salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 937203A698D for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 03:20:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.021
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.021 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.228, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 23k5AkVMQ9FG for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 03:20:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw4.ericsson.se (mailgw4.ericsson.se [193.180.251.62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23D483A6972 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 03:20:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb3e-b7bf6ae000005dda-0f-4aeabe0b57cb
Received: from esealmw127.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by mailgw4.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 51.04.24026.B0EBAEA4; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 11:20:59 +0100 (CET)
Received: from esealmw129.eemea.ericsson.se ([153.88.254.177]) by esealmw127.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 30 Oct 2009 11:19:48 +0100
Received: from mail.lmf.ericsson.se ([131.160.11.50]) by esealmw129.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 30 Oct 2009 11:19:47 +0100
Received: from nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se [131.160.33.3]) by mail.lmf.ericsson.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AEAD2514; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 12:19:45 +0200 (EET)
Received: from nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DD4121A22; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 12:19:45 +0200 (EET)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EE4821A1F; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 12:19:44 +0200 (EET)
Message-ID: <4AEABDBF.80705@ericsson.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 12:19:43 +0200
From: Salvatore Loreto <salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090825)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
References: <4AE966CA.9090907@ericsson.com> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0910300047310.25608@hixie.dreamhostps.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0910300047310.25608@hixie.dreamhostps.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Oct 2009 10:19:47.0881 (UTC) FILETIME=[821C1190:01CA594A]
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Cc: "hybi@ietf.org" <hybi@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [hybi] Proposed Charter for HyBi WG (rev.3)
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 10:20:45 -0000

Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Oct 2009, Salvatore Loreto wrote:
<snip>
>> In particular, the working group will liaison with the W3C WebApps 
>> working group around the WebSockets protocol and the requirements to 
>> support the WebSocket API; if agreed by both parties, the HyBi working 
>> group may take on prime responsibility on the specification of the 
>> WebSockets protocol.
>>     
>
> We should also liason with the WHATWG, since that's where most of the 
> WebSockets work has happened. (The W3C Web Apps working group hasn't 
> worked on the protocol at all, and they already liase with the WHATWG for 
> the API.)
>   
Hi Ian,
thanks for you comments, your are definitively right!
what about the following text?

    In particular, the working group will liaison with:
    - the W3C WebApps working group around the requirements to support 
      the WebSocket API; 
    - the WHATWG around the WebSockets protocol 
    if agreed by both parties, the HyBi working group may take on prime 
    responsibility on the specification of the WebSockets protocol.

one question: how IETF can become aware if WHATWG agrees or not?


/Sal