Re: [hybi] method of allocation of reserved bits to extensions

"Andy Green (林安廸)" <andy@warmcat.com> Thu, 26 May 2011 17:40 UTC

Return-Path: <andy.warmcat.com@googlemail.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C2E9E0721 for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 May 2011 10:40:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ikmgY7I+Pcyl for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 May 2011 10:40:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ww0-f44.google.com (mail-ww0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 086F3E06E9 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 May 2011 10:40:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wwa36 with SMTP id 36so715586wwa.13 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 May 2011 10:40:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent :mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=VsSkG72Rp0ifSduy189alcyJWQ6yaBOUlSJW3fiXclc=; b=ZKpdl+DSTGKDIe2BK0EBJ1pAcWOiDUUhDS/64ZE4jS4SxgBSFBIxBl7hDVs0Wj5Dpm PHY+Wnt7LuchUUHxBkuTIscXGlv2Ap8F3o9p992esNbi9NMIE9Jz7vIM2lnbUh6g362+ mIJSxuTsON+VnzlWhVhxLQmXzRNBzeF1uZ/64=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=tD/eln73nZQcgc1b0NpZ8r2gqLtLir8+K6jy5Zz0Qz4QUbFQYd+I+8dPjr+m+tOmUo qp127Ny9Kvpb+dix+1mqb0SYkgw9NqDEQnT5/aNcIi7oD7iFAPSpsypyMmXpmGS/AFOF M7RVqmFvFvVFZDgnX0o7oyuWTukGP1xWVmUvs=
Received: by 10.227.178.135 with SMTP id bm7mr1116927wbb.52.1306431622788; Thu, 26 May 2011 10:40:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from otae.warmcat.com (s15404224.onlinehome-server.info [87.106.134.80]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ge4sm624131wbb.13.2011.05.26.10.40.20 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 26 May 2011 10:40:21 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Andy Green <andy.warmcat.com@googlemail.com>
Message-ID: <4DDE9083.1010108@warmcat.com>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 18:40:19 +0100
From: "\"Andy Green (林安廸)\"" <andy@warmcat.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110428 Fedora/3.1.10-1.fc16 Thunderbird/3.1.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Salvatore Loreto <salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com>
References: <BANLkTi=vOQDtL5GobitKe8yiUoQFb2go_Q@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTikaOXg0u+4d8Ly6OxUQ7PFUU=udgQ@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTikiUkivJitZGU-+q6wBfJ3VW45F8g@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTindmLQ0KE6K5qUX2ue+=hoLUaznLA@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTim9w83iSY-TH1yuVAUXxypJk_tmrw@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTimnMBwNgP_e29exT6dUkp60s2xU3g@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTi==RTfqaYFT3CQs1pM5Tb501rk2Vg@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTinqQiMQ4N1vWjyCe682BmdisW-=KA@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTik1a6CEA8LiiLgsnBt9qHCaybmWfg@mail.gmail.com> <4DBA3809.4010004@oracle.com> <CA566BAEAD6B3F4E8B5C5C4F61710C11402DB23F@TK5EX14MBXW603.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20110524234152.03017c30@resistor.net> <4DDE85EC.2010001@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <4DDE85EC.2010001@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: hybi@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [hybi] method of allocation of reserved bits to extensions
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 17:40:25 -0000

On 05/26/2011 05:55 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
> After discussion with Gabriel,
> taking in consideration the long mail discussion and different positions
> on this topic,
> we have decided thata IANA strict assignment policy is the right way to
> handle the allocation of reserved bits

... and reserved opcodes?

-Andy