Re: [hybi] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-08.txt

[Ian Fette (イアンフェッティ) <[e-mail]>]

On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Bjoern Hoehrmann <[e-mail]> wrote:

> * Gabriel Montenegro wrote:
> >About compression: Greg already expressed this feeling on the mailing
> >list and there was very strong opposition. At this point, I’d rather we
> >not make such big changes. Let’s limit 09 to nits and typos.
>
> I don't care much about the next draft, but at some point we'll need a
> draft that addresses the known issues, so we can then have a working
> group last call to be sure that that the known issues have indeed been
> addressed so we can then ask the IESG to consider the document for pub-
> lication. When should we make the big changes to compression so we can
> move forward on that issue?
>
> (It is possible you might mean that the next draft is meant as just a
> bit of polish as last step before an IETF Last Call, so we are really
> past a point where we would consider "big changes". I do not believe
> that is the case, we haven't, for instance, been getting any comments
> from the W3C who work on the browser API for Websockets, on the
> document, that I've seen anyway; and I haven't done any review in April
> when you announced a Last Call myself, since we still had to make "big
> changes" like to compression at that point. Overall, there has been a
> distinct lack of review of the document so far. Greg Wilkins noted he
> found the Last Call premature. I very much agree.)
>
>
>From the W3C side, Hixie and I have gone over it and he just published a new
API spec a day or two ago that properly lines up the two documents.



> As an aside, I am not aware of any opposition to address the security
> concerns I noted with respect to `deflate-stream` back in April.
> --
> Björn Höhrmann · mailto:[e-mail] · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
> Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: [phone] · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
> 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
>