IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hybi] Experiment comparing Upgrade and CONNECT handshakes

Joe Mason <jmason@rim.com> Wed, 01 December 2010 00:15 UTC

Return-Path: <jmason@rim.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8B273A6BCD for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 16:15:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.402
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.402 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.199, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HYE7yDOaQGEw for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 16:15:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mhs04ykf.rim.net (mhs04ykf.rim.net [216.9.243.82]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B241E3A69D7 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 16:15:36 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: 0a666446-b7b93ae0000009e4-2f-4cf593f07429
Received: from XHT110CNC.rim.net ( [10.65.22.55]) by mhs04ykf.rim.net (RIM Mail) with SMTP id FD.FA.02532.0F395FC4; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 19:16:48 -0500 (EST)
Received: from XCH117CNC.rim.net ([fe80::b8df:541f:9d85:9909]) by XHT110CNC.rim.net ([fe80::d0e9:e16f:525b:55f5%11]) with mapi; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 19:16:48 -0500
From: Joe Mason <jmason@rim.com>
To: Adam Barth <ietf@adambarth.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 19:16:44 -0500
Thread-Topic: [hybi] Experiment comparing Upgrade and CONNECT handshakes
Thread-Index: AcuQ5kLsOx1tZGt1SVSRPC+JV2wLHwABn1sA
Message-ID: <BB31C4AB95A70042A256109D46199126057903CE@XCH117CNC.rim.net>
References: <AANLkTim_8g-Cb01si00EkvCK5BtXUx3zHsUee1F6JqsD@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTimSu1fOGCg0gqX2EFh4v-MkpZuY_-onm3+TO_Z0@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTimYpdp-75BQSmhAUfyrQv19LvzF1ouznst+ANUG@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTikbycTS51Ein9ybbZ52zcrViFCNBjCmpRGD3yCk@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTim=_Ey_7tSJ0H8OKzip-UcwtJ=YMG5wf_f_qnty@mail.gmail.com> <20101127071644.GB26428@1wt.eu> <AANLkTi=Rqu-hm=Jy-GFf706smD8zEHbeD-oP7dNCN6Ro@mail.gmail.com> <20101127161638.GE26428@1wt.eu> <AANLkTi=snwcb8F89KjpD8tQUYSSBr6YF1OdaGgr1e9Xa@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTi=2M1ubEgR44PL7JpydkaZaOwwimuvhJq=E30+A@mail.gmail.com> <4CF1EFF9.7040803@caucho.com> <AANLkTimotYL70P3Rqwz3uFbf=G3JERkUJqqdEhU6eMEb@mail.gmail.com> <4CF3E676.8040001@caucho.com> <AANLkTimn92qXDa+7HNW79bSSHhEryH0kPCYYbkDsUZRZ@mail.gmail.com> <4CF3F563.3050808@caucho.com> <AANLkTimW3CP-B9TuXhtRYr051eExkMgZPT_Rm7XMp8NK@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTimgs8Sw_Witxk+T4tx0_+vHiXdA=Hv6b1wQ4mey@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimgs8Sw_Witxk+T4tx0_+vHiXdA=Hv6b1wQ4mey@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAgAAAZEW1I9v
Cc: Hybi <hybi@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [hybi] Experiment comparing Upgrade and CONNECT handshakes
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 00:15:38 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: hybi-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:hybi-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Adam Barth
> Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 6:27 PM
> To: Brian
> Cc: Hybi
> Subject: Re: [hybi] Experiment comparing Upgrade and CONNECT handshakes
> 
> That's the most up-to-date version.
> 
> Adam
> 
> 
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Brian <theturtle32@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Adam, since it's been a while and I've lost the link to the new
> > handshake proposal, can you verify for me (and others) that this is
> > the most up-to-date version that I should be reading?
> >
> > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-abarth-websocket-handshake-01

I noticed that version uses XOR for masking, while your paper mentioned using AES.  Are you planning to update this proposal to use AES as well?  (Also, now that I've read the thing, here's another vote for rewriting it in declarative style.)

Joe

---------------------------------------------------------------------
This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential information, privileged material (including material protected by the solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email