Re: [hybi] Websocket algorithmic specification
Justin Erenkrantz <justin@erenkrantz.com> Tue, 02 February 2010 17:02 UTC
Return-Path: <justin.erenkrantz@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A6F03A6B4D for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 09:02:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id datS1eBU6S9m for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 09:02:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com (qw-out-2122.google.com [74.125.92.26]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82B163A6A31 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 09:02:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 9so102287qwb.31 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 09:02:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; bh=Ak7tpOkacNUVengNatXKKJ/mTP+XGwAMMeyDibLx6RA=; b=FXoCSPK9k53a3ic/d//tZ6P72z6I9tm4bq5/0kDE/Cq8+lHiNyE1/zyDdb/A7jLskj kXglmUdv9w4B44KPEMJAPPpCzzW/U3d/qeTWIhJV+wBwIAgTI/cm3SCsJJYLvtfBCI3v BcX7Ur7m8pfkdlVnK5oMh6nWgMcouy3OdWUUs=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=D+k5+QfzbzpESt8mkVhtehZrVDOCVuhJ/dYsc0saNFEq5c5sEKhannRvKXATf9iJio 62MemoTFqlxNjU4wp1LLCJq23S0mnnBeENIqHa5FPyFfWvTHkcGm9JjcJmyp3SyF6AfU FrU8LYJQkmI24CHTOhJJrLYvMMK1PaokKBEqQ=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: justin.erenkrantz@gmail.com
Received: by 10.142.59.4 with SMTP id h4mr4150498wfa.187.1265130168110; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 09:02:48 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4B679A89.9080609@webtide.com>
References: <4B675896.7050308@webtide.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1002020300060.3846@ps20323.dreamhostps.com> <4B679A89.9080609@webtide.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 09:02:48 -0800
X-Google-Sender-Auth: edc2583751138330
Message-ID: <5c902b9e1002020902x3258ad6eu5163553c169f7019@mail.gmail.com>
From: Justin Erenkrantz <justin@erenkrantz.com>
To: Greg Wilkins <gregw@webtide.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: "hybi@ietf.org" <hybi@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [hybi] Websocket algorithmic specification
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 17:02:14 -0000
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Greg Wilkins <gregw@webtide.com> wrote: > Again, the point is - if the algorithm style is meant to > convey all the error handling, then it needs to be thorough. +1! If the intent is to force implementors to "stop reading between the lines", then the lines had better be crystal clear about what needs to happen. -- justin
- [hybi] Websocket algorithmic specification Greg Wilkins
- Re: [hybi] Websocket algorithmic specification Ian Hickson
- Re: [hybi] Websocket algorithmic specification Greg Wilkins
- Re: [hybi] Websocket algorithmic specification Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: [hybi] Websocket algorithmic specification Jamie Lokier
- Re: [hybi] Websocket algorithmic specification Greg Wilkins