IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hybi] Requirement: extensions and sub protocols

Salvatore Loreto <salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com> Fri, 05 March 2010 17:32 UTC

Return-Path: <salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13B4B28C2FD for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Mar 2010 09:32:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.71
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.71 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.111, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e3ovu99fb5C8 for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Mar 2010 09:32:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailgw9.se.ericsson.net (mailgw9.se.ericsson.net [193.180.251.57]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D13BC28C2FC for <hybi@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Mar 2010 09:32:41 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb39-b7c2dae000007b99-a0-4b91403ba464
Received: from esealmw129.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw9.se.ericsson.net (Symantec Brightmail Gateway) with SMTP id 76.DD.31641.B30419B4; Fri, 5 Mar 2010 18:32:43 +0100 (CET)
Received: from esealmw127.eemea.ericsson.se ([153.88.254.171]) by esealmw129.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 5 Mar 2010 18:31:43 +0100
Received: from mail.lmf.ericsson.se ([131.160.11.50]) by esealmw127.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 5 Mar 2010 18:31:43 +0100
Received: from nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se [131.160.33.3]) by mail.lmf.ericsson.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29BEB2787; Fri, 5 Mar 2010 19:31:43 +0200 (EET)
Received: from nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4F034F022; Fri, 5 Mar 2010 19:31:42 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DA2E4EF77; Fri, 5 Mar 2010 19:31:42 +0200 (EET)
Message-ID: <4B913FFD.5040500@ericsson.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2010 19:31:41 +0200
From: Salvatore Loreto <salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100301 Fedora/3.0.3-1.fc12 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Greg Wilkins <gregw@webtide.com>
References: <4B8ECA2D.4050303@ericsson.com> <4B9118DC.6030301@webtide.com> <4B91311F.20109@ericsson.com> <4B9135C1.50304@webtide.com>
In-Reply-To: <4B9135C1.50304@webtide.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Mar 2010 17:31:43.0273 (UTC) FILETIME=[B8EF9190:01CABC89]
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Cc: "hybi@ietf.org" <hybi@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [hybi] Requirement: extensions and sub protocols
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2010 17:32:46 -0000

On 03/05/2010 06:48 PM, Greg Wilkins wrote:
> Salvatore Loreto wrote:
>    
>> here we are talking about *protocol* requirements
>> it is not the right place to discuss about the actual solution(s).
>>      
> I thought I was?
>
> Isn't it important to have a definition of what an extension
> is (including who is doing the extension) as part of the requirements?
>
>    
it is more important have a *reason* for the proposed requirement,
definition can mislead and be interpreted as a different requirement or 
a solution.

at moment we do not have any requirement that talk about the relation
with WebSocket API...
and to tell the true I am a bit surprised W3C WebApps has not proposed
any requirements.
I'll start a separate trade about it

cheers
Sal

Salvatore Loreto
www.sloreto.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email