IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hybi] Websockets sub-protocol registry

Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 21 March 2016 18:38 UTC

Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A453412D88D for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 11:38:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Tf7HQvPi9DK0 for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 11:38:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x231.google.com (mail-oi0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B488B12D719 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 11:38:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x231.google.com with SMTP id l76so59491528oig.1 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 11:38:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=InPyyOJcHo9AjqaUBQqajE0RJMwQdL5TPzQfIBrtF2A=; b=cmsdTaffFF6aaks0j16105wKKBzqKWejU3wXsjseo2lYJQB0zl9PxyF12EpRvGPRrl noWN82ik9RsQsUJdIAmpMP0kzIVM9V4JN2r0/b8BL6yZnuC8aB1x02v2rhDe9ECt/0ZZ D5XbWF4cRsA+Rb+rBX2T4lYJu2tIu4/Eu61KhaX/TR7CVY8/yOP7BY2PVlahuTm/oOav mFfODOSURxIIMKhTO0BoZ7dbWulMKL0W95ZSBfgV9sOkyzkFweflNZUI/rh4ZhV2v3cR UrjcWJt0XcK3ie+ITIYFRf98OnF+Qrx8dqRqj6b1xAo9FWZDK9BFnyvQrvDDqWjje6DI dO7Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=InPyyOJcHo9AjqaUBQqajE0RJMwQdL5TPzQfIBrtF2A=; b=Vdph13awUaIR1GWBu7uL1XTHrqnl1od0uNeT7b1ccRVrw7ma31zKihm60A85MwYeCE 4oRS5ecG6EfgQkIslvn+rML/Nlb0ND/Y4XALDa7hipGOpTD+0LFluaVaRlYXtGXwrQsL ut7Cnuo2AE+29oMCnpTw6mv24IuQrsqjmIHvvK9ES6Sn7Et6nmnDglx1nDxvsAlg967I CaM4vcTat2mV8W/L/ENb5XP2O02URVFhlhTN75/k7R2ey6uLmtUOc+P82x0aeULswEnM t80rhuAvuoXhOLDMpizobAAS9jKHwYbm6KcwM5T4D2tq16bbVXy3MiuijiodGFhj7mkl B4GA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJK+ceG478JAu3rSi0Jd1B/stt+Z3WTCxA9PO5dEAmtIVrMHquqKMLqCYzJYRZWm0EWU7B6FdMfFrX0n3w==
X-Received: by 10.202.169.151 with SMTP id s145mr15797522oie.35.1458585518146; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 11:38:38 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.157.51.6 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 11:38:18 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <56F03E3D.1010405@isode.com>
References: <CA+9kkMDZQ_dPM76HaAKwvsRaOhdyvbQd+YLOCTR9piBYO2Kt+w@mail.gmail.com> <CADnb78gBkzjhVRQgzF29hNq4LsCZ=vSu4CJSM9nDWuLVcsOzDw@mail.gmail.com> <CA+9kkMCriEjDrs0Fpb-6QGcuZLWX37xVTBo6wk1Zq9cBSRMTxw@mail.gmail.com> <CADnb78iuJ=F=uhOTfyKx7mnH6wtpN6Pjqa2w2sQ7ZCbdULU_rw@mail.gmail.com> <CA+9kkMA5gHqd9QgfOseowEuFsE=sp8yjcUDa+6A06rQg650Jvw@mail.gmail.com> <56E6E454.7090207@gmx.de> <CA+9kkMCPkZcaM6xF0ctkhnz+Uju0WNj24pJ+-+VUqgkRy0BEjw@mail.gmail.com> <56EC0A26.1070107@isode.com> <CA+9kkMAeJ7g_vizZwWnAXCeEA19DksEOhAOfzo14XM8uPMpgwg@mail.gmail.com> <56F03E3D.1010405@isode.com>
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 11:38:18 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMCD6iMjMLvx=zL0s-Q0uKOLThQ4nhuL_G-s8mQ87h9_2g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113cad50af0bbe052e9367d7"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hybi/hcFRufB846dCua3ZR5Mg1kYCDoI>
Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [hybi] Websockets sub-protocol registry
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hybi/>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 18:38:40 -0000

On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com
> wrote:

>
> On 21/03/2016 15:54, Ted Hardie wrote:
>



>
>
> 2.  Clarified instructions
>
>    The tokens registered in the Websockets sub-protocol registry created
>    by RFC 6445 Section 11.5 are matched using case-sensitive string
>    match.  IANA is, however, instructed to decline registrations in the
>    registry which differ only as to case, in order to minimize potential
>    confusion among different registered versions.  For other useful
>    advice on avoiding collision, registrants are encouraged to consult
>    the non-normative section 1.9 of RFC 6445.
>
> 6445 --> 6455. But otherwise this looks good.
>

Sigh.  I caught in the title and the references and missed it here.  Will
fix.

Ted


>
> Ted
>
>> or possibly even in an accepted erratum.
>>
>> We can do that as well. Although I would rather the erratum not being the
>> only source of information on this.
>>
>> If it were an accepted erratum for RFC 6445, we would likely still want
>> to include something in the RTCWEB docs noting that those were the rules
>> (but not having that doc update the RFC.)
>>
>> Any thoughts on that approach?
>>
>>
>>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email