Re: [hybi] updated HyBi BoF Agenda

I don't think we should stress "independent" any more than
we should stress trying to find a one size fits all solution.

While there may be different use-cases, there is also a huge
amount of commonality between what any of the solutions needs
to achieve.

So maybe lets just say "other protocols & proposals".

Note - while my name is down against this section, I don't
want to monopolize the whole 15m.  If anybody anticipates
wanting to speak during this period - please contact me
and we can divide up the time - plus leave time for others
to speak from the floor... or move into the following
open discussion earlier than scheduled.

cheers

Pieter Hintjens wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 7:28 PM, Salvatore Loreto
> <salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com> wrote:
> 
>> You are absolutely right, maybe alternative is not the right word,
>> I should have used something like "different" prospective or
>> even more explicitly "different problem/solution space"!
> 
> What we have, I think, are a set of independent specification projects
> in progress, each addressing part of the overall problem space.  That
> leads us to questions of what exactly their problem spaces are, what
> their status is in terms of implementation and proof, and what scope
> there is for coordination, competition and/or interoperability.
> 
> Greg, Ian, does that sound right or am I being presumptuous here?
> 
> -Pieter
> _______________________________________________
> hybi mailing list
> hybi@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi