IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hybi] Ticket#1 Http Compliance

Greg Wilkins <gregw@webtide.com> Thu, 13 May 2010 12:37 UTC

Return-Path: <gregw@webtide.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54E433A69D2 for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 May 2010 05:37:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.875
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.875 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.235, BAYES_05=-1.11]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FHAeyOfWwBjL for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 May 2010 05:37:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wy0-f172.google.com (mail-wy0-f172.google.com [74.125.82.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3312B3A692D for <hybi@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 May 2010 05:33:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wyb36 with SMTP id 36so948887wyb.31 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 May 2010 05:33:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.227.127.148 with SMTP id g20mr8128041wbs.192.1273754005580; Thu, 13 May 2010 05:33:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.100] (host116-234-static.43-88-b.business.telecomitalia.it [88.43.234.116]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x34sm8628030wbd.22.2010.05.13.05.33.24 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 13 May 2010 05:33:24 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4BEBF190.1050301@webtide.com>
Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 14:33:20 +0200
From: Greg Wilkins <gregw@webtide.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100411)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "hybi@ietf.org" <hybi@ietf.org>
References: <4BEAB021.5030600@webtide.com> <op.vcmr0hge64w2qv@annevk-t60> <4BEBB81F.4010506@webtide.com> <op.vcm3kopz64w2qv@annevk-t60>
In-Reply-To: <op.vcm3kopz64w2qv@annevk-t60>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [hybi] Ticket#1 Http Compliance
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 12:37:58 -0000

Anne van Kesteren wrote:

> I don't believe that shifting the debate to discussing requirements
> instead is a good idea. To me it makes everything less concrete and far
> more vague as to what the intentions are of people proposing the
> requirements. We don't necessarily need to have a (lack of a)
> requirement to do what you say. We could just make a WG decision.


Anne,

Is it a requirement to have a requirements document?

I'm afraid that is too meta-physical for me.  I've been asked
to edit the requirements document as part of the IETF process
and that's what I'm attempting to do.

regards

v2.37.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status