IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hybi] consensus call: websocketprotocol baseline

SM <sm@resistor.net> Sat, 08 May 2010 10:24 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C5A83A69E4 for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 8 May 2010 03:24:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.365
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.365 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.234, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eQo1dk7Slbf1 for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 8 May 2010 03:24:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ns1.qubic.net (ns1.qubic.net [208.69.177.116]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C6DF3A6A21 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Sat, 8 May 2010 03:24:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sm-PC.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.qubic.net (8.14.5.Alpha0/8.14.5.Alpha0) with ESMTP id o48ANi6v017751 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 8 May 2010 03:23:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1273314234; x=1273400634; bh=PYo6Hfn2GW8XhRkTg9vseoeOl/SnNfqQuozaj/vgxOA=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type:Cc; b=qerhzfJW/rdvjmMI0BFloUlZVuEkG4qkRG9ity4BSX4utqukKNtLv9aoAWUBKwHJZ crjhLriKPainELw22LB+H8LFY4Mu9tvviJ+GBUPpzDeycLOKfU+Z7l3nTfTSCIR2Ri xHYOywjxKGLB2noB95kK3NlOiuWv3u9cuiM/Ifvs=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1273314234; x=1273400634; bh=PYo6Hfn2GW8XhRkTg9vseoeOl/SnNfqQuozaj/vgxOA=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type:Cc; b=FKx4oGIlFWjaYE1YckDsRzgx2GFFHTmdPav9TcQOiXAKQXg5IWCAiNv4m7V2XjvDH IKgLg9SLmXILF7HxtX1sxzFtRPruaMJDsDJwtZpJsFiP8csf72JzjYHjy4SBVHfQ9R nqVdg/QE6ETwKmMuSStlIavegFuSQCosL/FbV/lw=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=mail; d=resistor.net; c=simple; q=dns; b=baTdWPIhDV1DamIEfTEZmQVc2rwoNxHUSVV68VxYn4l4xaHqq/Z1VNXwmLDp1PRG4 tOWHxznUP0i73zDzL+THUq0SzQ9TPHv1Ajq6RYERGggSL8GRbnTLJkn9YXTOpPsUPR0 jk97fqjC1xmUjEiipyfSkGUQoRdHRBQMNE8lfYw=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20100508030939.091869f0@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Sat, 08 May 2010 03:18:18 -0700
To: hybi@ietf.org
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <4BE426B3.7010500@gmx.de>
References: <4BE41BCB.7010707@ericsson.com> <4BE4241B.7060906@webtide.com> <4BE426B3.7010500@gmx.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Subject: Re: [hybi] consensus call: websocketprotocol baseline
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 May 2010 10:24:48 -0000

At 07:41 AM 5/7/2010, Julian Reschke wrote:
>That being said, the *much* more interesting question (to me at 
>least) is how we manage the process once we have a Working Group draft.

The usual way.  Changes are proposed on this mailing list and they 
are incorporated into the I-D if the changes are not 
controversial.  The editor of the I-D can always ask the WG Chairs 
for advice if he/she isn't sure about the issue.

Regards,
-sm

v2.37.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status