IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hybi] method of allocation of reserved bits to extensions

Gabriel Montenegro <Gabriel.Montenegro@microsoft.com> Thu, 26 May 2011 21:09 UTC

Return-Path: <Gabriel.Montenegro@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DCCAE07A9 for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 May 2011 14:09:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.524
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.524 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.075, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tuS1JLcxuTt2 for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 May 2011 14:09:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.microsoft.com (smtp.microsoft.com [131.107.115.214]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83E92E0694 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 May 2011 14:09:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from TK5EX14HUBC102.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.7.154) by TK5-EXGWY-E803.partners.extranet.microsoft.com (10.251.56.169) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.176.0; Thu, 26 May 2011 14:09:36 -0700
Received: from TK5EX14MLTW652.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com (157.54.71.68) by TK5EX14HUBC102.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.7.154) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.289.8; Thu, 26 May 2011 14:09:36 -0700
Received: from TK5EX14MBXW603.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com ([169.254.3.209]) by TK5EX14MLTW652.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com ([157.54.71.68]) with mapi id 14.01.0289.008; Thu, 26 May 2011 14:09:35 -0700
From: Gabriel Montenegro <Gabriel.Montenegro@microsoft.com>
To: "\"Andy Green (林安廸)\"" <andy@warmcat.com>, Salvatore Loreto <salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com>
Thread-Topic: [hybi] method of allocation of reserved bits to extensions
Thread-Index: AQHMGqhX1u9834hjukKLiEqBfS9wQZSfy14AgAAMoID//8UJ0A==
Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 21:09:35 +0000
Message-ID: <CA566BAEAD6B3F4E8B5C5C4F61710C11402F3206@TK5EX14MBXW603.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
References: <BANLkTi=vOQDtL5GobitKe8yiUoQFb2go_Q@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTikaOXg0u+4d8Ly6OxUQ7PFUU=udgQ@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTikiUkivJitZGU-+q6wBfJ3VW45F8g@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTindmLQ0KE6K5qUX2ue+=hoLUaznLA@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTim9w83iSY-TH1yuVAUXxypJk_tmrw@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTimnMBwNgP_e29exT6dUkp60s2xU3g@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTi==RTfqaYFT3CQs1pM5Tb501rk2Vg@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTinqQiMQ4N1vWjyCe682BmdisW-=KA@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTik1a6CEA8LiiLgsnBt9qHCaybmWfg@mail.gmail.com> <4DBA3809.4010004@oracle.com> <CA566BAEAD6B3F4E8B5C5C4F61710C11402DB23F@TK5EX14MBXW603.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20110524234152.03017c30@resistor.net> <4DDE85EC.2010001@ericsson.com> <4DDE9083.1010108@warmcat.com>
In-Reply-To: <4DDE9083.1010108@warmcat.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [157.54.51.43]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "hybi@ietf.org" <hybi@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [hybi] method of allocation of reserved bits to extensions
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 21:09:37 -0000

Also reserved opcodes, yes.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: hybi-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:hybi-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> "Andy Green (???)"
> Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2011 10:40
> To: Salvatore Loreto
> Cc: hybi@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [hybi] method of allocation of reserved bits to extensions
> 
> On 05/26/2011 05:55 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
> > After discussion with Gabriel,
> > taking in consideration the long mail discussion and different
> > positions on this topic, we have decided thata IANA strict assignment
> > policy is the right way to handle the allocation of reserved bits
> 
> ... and reserved opcodes?
> 
> -Andy
> _______________________________________________
> hybi mailing list
> hybi@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email