IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hybi] Straw poll: Do you miss per-frame extension? (was: Re: Discontinuation of mux ...)

Adam Rice <ricea@google.com> Wed, 19 February 2014 06:46 UTC

Return-Path: <ricea@google.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8AE41A033F for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 22:46:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.926
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.926 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6V3RABvAD5KP for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 22:46:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oa0-x236.google.com (mail-oa0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::236]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5310F1A030F for <hybi@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 22:46:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id j17so354851oag.13 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 22:46:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=KiQUnJaanrXmS/lm7Go8z9z4A4l6QVxvJpyv9vPDWME=; b=WRrLZIov++AKBGaO898Wd/cokilIAwBhG4ARQs9MEtQciy2ilvQ0UhHbnMwMvjOEas yzBdROfLK8Z+9ltAtiRTqFhcDmfmTd0deO6bb9gW+Nnsep8IszIwlmJoaFgpjNsTUOCY NwKfaAx1tkBbNWQ2MGxJgYpBTPfMK5JG0YxALS7Gg/tHyB9Svd/itgWTeFlqbfI7LJ9Y Fem4yDZP4+1+ASPti3/Iesoeu0n7U1mCSbehGe9dGmw8OSRQqPGlpaLMarvi8dvj8+pv 2bP3JimRA7EJlkaOOIdTVKsmPQuwQXhfsR3vS1BLW8pnWqPCue9wuTX4KfxoCjeWywCZ 2GxA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=KiQUnJaanrXmS/lm7Go8z9z4A4l6QVxvJpyv9vPDWME=; b=iR4Bbg9Mv7OjTRIcLzxCgI3U4lMq4NNbljXBD3+d2/qb6dQFfzPUAhq5+QeHrHGrjY /E3FLjCuBVbHGTEw6zDOc1Zc+5jAeexEHQm3nr/t9r8gHfJTyZXrCNy1XpKToKfx3O/A VyW4zJAeWgfxqcFdNKSVwwGNkiaSbIYUPAMrLUOuHRAVdpgMiKNUSJRiBDCcQ3lLiKqt QDDCI1bn/xftUqq/4My98p588wGm5asfnHcWU2Y9QEJ23YIpckD03u9hWllZ0kL+Fg2w 09Iw9tz2Tlv7U8Mnl+cK/JxIx5JiENrM5drYxwKZS39MMlOqs972NH5GW4iE0148dTsj muVw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlhfUdKiGXqkkkXrkfhA5XdR2uicuhCiichFlZ2YT9CTq8L2gK/9LdSrJTBdcbhXQYvN2dZmOU+g4kaEHBvjhFo7rWB7N2XtOtWXkyJMi3OvyCxsZ0arzAKExFQXXqc7gOutAE424b/Iqd+XkMr725Vi+5a10jn3AVbvUssueqgTuTUvF8Ai605YW7W2iqEeZNO7RGX
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.228.135 with SMTP id si7mr29461955oec.4.1392792397095; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 22:46:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.182.118.41 with HTTP; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 22:46:37 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAH9hSJbQ9kWjtYCd6UM9hAGA=gr0oE7M5BVPtwJq1K8-95hAkQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAH9hSJa0XvzmS1MmmPmqKjQs0P8EUP8n=x+b0im1S2CO5wL1NA@mail.gmail.com> <CAH9hSJbQ9kWjtYCd6UM9hAGA=gr0oE7M5BVPtwJq1K8-95hAkQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 15:46:37 +0900
Message-ID: <CAHixhFqUcmfs3jiJBv3Wvmm8VhHgLsutSvoDOQ=05PUaQ=m+ng@mail.gmail.com>
From: Adam Rice <ricea@google.com>
To: Takeshi Yoshino <tyoshino@google.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113639101342e604f2bcc030"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hybi/lC3-e05BSVle8ul1jnMU4irmVJU
Cc: "hybi@ietf.org" <hybi@ietf.org>, Peter Thorson <webmaster@zaphoyd.com>
Subject: Re: [hybi] Straw poll: Do you miss per-frame extension? (was: Re: Discontinuation of mux ...)
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi/>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 06:46:43 -0000

My answer is also "no, I would not miss per-frame extensions." Adding and
removing frame boundaries is useful when implementing intermediaries, and
needing a separate code path which preserved frame boundaries would be a
nuisance.

I also support the removal of this capability in the successor to RFC6455.


On 19 February 2014 13:11, Takeshi Yoshino <tyoshino@google.com> wrote:

> My answer is "no, I don't". I think we should drop per-frame extension
> capability. Even RFC 6455 should be updated to drop it when we get chance
> to do so.
>
> _______________________________________________
> hybi mailing list
> hybi@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email