IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hybi] WebSocket: current status and next steps

Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> Mon, 11 July 2011 01:26 UTC

Return-Path: <gregw@intalio.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6975A21F8661 for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 18:26:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.773
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.773 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.204, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qQgfvgjtys-Y for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 18:26:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vw0-f44.google.com (mail-vw0-f44.google.com [209.85.212.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D413221F8655 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 18:26:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vws12 with SMTP id 12so3575255vws.31 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 18:26:52 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.174.113 with SMTP id br17mr5151658vdc.107.1310347583550; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 18:26:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.52.115.103 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 18:26:23 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAKmKYaCumLtwt7M_PjkeBaOAGM=gX9v2GwWvzwseKT94xY9=9A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4E16C0E5.40106@ericsson.com> <CAKmKYaCumLtwt7M_PjkeBaOAGM=gX9v2GwWvzwseKT94xY9=9A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 11:26:23 +1000
Message-ID: <CAH_y2NG==nnGyx8g+37o2m_x+ubkPDBMeS+btXOah6Wc6QykOA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>
To: Dirkjan Ochtman <dirkjan@ochtman.nl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: "hybi@ietf.org" <hybi@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [hybi] WebSocket: current status and next steps
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 01:26:53 -0000

On 8 July 2011 18:48, Dirkjan Ochtman <dirkjan@ochtman.nl> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 10:33, Salvatore Loreto
> For the deflate extension, it seems to me that there's a fair amount
> of consensus on this list (in "deflate-stream and masking") that the
> deflate-stream extension as specified in draft-09 is suboptimal. Given
> that, it seems prudent to exclude it from the WebSocket Protocol spec
> for now and await the outcome of the perframe-deflate efforts.

+1

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email