Re: [hybi] The future of WebSockets, and the WiSH proposal

Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> Tue, 25 April 2017 08:09 UTC

Return-Path: <annevk@annevk.nl>
X-Original-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07BE1131A11 for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 01:09:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.519
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.519 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=annevk.nl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fjoSJn4WfYcy for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 01:09:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a4.g.dreamhost.com (homie.mail.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.208]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D23DC131A0D for <hybi@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 01:09:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a4.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a4.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ED9E51C063 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 01:09:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=annevk.nl; h=mime-version :in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=annevk.nl; bh=ANbwmFZ bsCi/+iHl8WYvnsq7JTI=; b=YKsU/xx/Q+MesY9/PBDCgxusZfSDkYn4j6it1Di TF9qfbk/Z5+GotkNff1iWFiY66ASYXyXkJBCAa8HND5ODXOy1Ch8Ubipp+V+vVXK 47HAU/gghZK9NOPUN/T3Nvnif3qeF+5LJr+TCj7DwOaEv/+PPfawhVC/DbljIC+D w97k=
Received: from mail-yw0-f172.google.com (mail-yw0-f172.google.com [209.85.161.172]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: annevk@annevk.nl) by homiemail-a4.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BC7EE51C062 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 01:09:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-f172.google.com with SMTP id l18so32980470ywh.3 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 01:09:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/7NwtRTQq16R+hlEwyCs9rVFpluvtHTyOo+tdNMqI6NYxT/OcXW b8aqfMClZEqNXKToFYWBv/1muy89rg==
X-Received: by 10.129.41.75 with SMTP id p72mr8606599ywp.215.1493107753034; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 01:09:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.255.1 with HTTP; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 01:09:12 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAH9hSJYpnp0FXt9SsrujJM4OHcXe=pryUtHmM6dmcpgG67hdBw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAH9hSJYpnp0FXt9SsrujJM4OHcXe=pryUtHmM6dmcpgG67hdBw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 10:09:12 +0200
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CADnb78iPu7ACqZkYJ6SqceE2JNtV+y6M3ojT5PdGmDVoqZHsyQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CADnb78iPu7ACqZkYJ6SqceE2JNtV+y6M3ojT5PdGmDVoqZHsyQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Takeshi Yoshino <tyoshino@google.com>
Cc: "hybi@ietf.org" <hybi@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hybi/lckm6iOG-eKMGhx5lAtPE7afOU0>
Subject: Re: [hybi] The future of WebSockets, and the WiSH proposal
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hybi/>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 08:09:16 -0000

On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Takeshi Yoshino <tyoshino@google.com> wrote:
> We’d like to hear your feedback on the WiSH proposal and/or any general
> thoughts on how to evolve WS.

I still don't really understand why we'd put new code in browsers
before gaining some experience with full-duplex fetch(). What
advantages remain? That you get a dedicated connection? That the
frames are slightly smaller? Can we find ways to get those advantages
into fetch() and a future version of HTTP?


-- 
https://annevankesteren.nl/