Re: [hybi] Websockets sub-protocol registry

Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> Mon, 14 March 2016 15:58 UTC

Return-Path: <annevk@annevk.nl>
X-Original-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7D0E12DB3E for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 08:58:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.373
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.373 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.347, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=annevk.nl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TCmjkXaNjz4h for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 08:58:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a61.g.dreamhost.com (homie.mail.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.208]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A44F712DBB2 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 08:56:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a61.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a61.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 403EC57807B for <hybi@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 08:56:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=annevk.nl; h=mime-version :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc: content-type; s=annevk.nl; bh=/o/pic93l4ilhJ3UKFquqQkSPXM=; b=Ar XLfsKZJLIZbuwxmAK+NI3+D3VVARvloQ5pZju3k2o+TWWC0o5VlaYhWPg2GOFNnI r95DKpHxiC983CPXvst681ZQ0zHl78g9ck4ATzJWGXF6uV32msVYBoRiJx835tR3 Bb9TwJoU6wnrNom2ohhpnkRkEiP/qu/pkCn9BjfSI=
Received: from mail-yw0-f170.google.com (mail-yw0-f170.google.com [209.85.161.170]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: annevk@annevk.nl) by homiemail-a61.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2E94B578078 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 08:56:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-f170.google.com with SMTP id g127so172627660ywf.2 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 08:56:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJKSkekFCwr34S4fa+DckrEPfIhWbFRFKmEJLS+1HiTaT6vzFf/qXBF7IcVbo6XiEbIB0K2poLcivZMtlw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.37.42.22 with SMTP id q22mr1506407ybq.178.1457970963515; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 08:56:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.37.50.78 with HTTP; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 08:56:03 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CA+9kkMCriEjDrs0Fpb-6QGcuZLWX37xVTBo6wk1Zq9cBSRMTxw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+9kkMDZQ_dPM76HaAKwvsRaOhdyvbQd+YLOCTR9piBYO2Kt+w@mail.gmail.com> <CADnb78gBkzjhVRQgzF29hNq4LsCZ=vSu4CJSM9nDWuLVcsOzDw@mail.gmail.com> <CA+9kkMCriEjDrs0Fpb-6QGcuZLWX37xVTBo6wk1Zq9cBSRMTxw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 16:56:03 +0100
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CADnb78iuJ=F=uhOTfyKx7mnH6wtpN6Pjqa2w2sQ7ZCbdULU_rw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CADnb78iuJ=F=uhOTfyKx7mnH6wtpN6Pjqa2w2sQ7ZCbdULU_rw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
To: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hybi/neISaFpPP9_Fq0d-QbwRRyWnAso>
Cc: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [hybi] Websockets sub-protocol registry
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hybi/>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 15:58:10 -0000

On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 4:01 PM, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> We simply don't want to assume it; we'd like it to be specified, at least in
> the RTCWEB case.

In the typical use of the word, "a" does not match "A".


> Back to the IANA side of the question: Any objection to specifying that IANA
> should not register two values that differed only in  case?  The current
> instructions aren't clear on that.

Why? That would restrict the value space. We don't do that for HTTP
verbs either (although it might make sense there, and require them to
be uppercase).


-- 
https://annevankesteren.nl/