Re: [hybi] Framing Take VI (a compromise proposal)

[Dave Cridland <[e-mail]>]

On Fri Aug 13 01:53:23 2010, Ian Fette (イアンフェッティ)  
wrote:
> The below proposal is based largely on Dave's earlier proposal, to  
> give
> credit where it's due. Takeshi Yoshino and John Tamplin are largely  
> to
> credit for the modifications, my contribution is minimal :) We've  
> tried to
> take into account what have come out of various consensus calls as  
> well as
> where it seems people aren't likely to budge. We've given in on a  
> number of
> points (e.g. multiplexing, giving up fixed 16-bit length,  
> supporting a
> 64-bit length for large messages) in an attempt to make progress,  
> so I would
> also ask that people really think about what they feel strongly  
> about and
> what they can be willing to consider to support consensus.

I basically like this - nothing that's present gives me cause for  
concern.

I do reiterate my previous suggestion that the group give serious  
consideration to including a multiplex identifier within the header,  
however, or at least space for one via usage of a reserved bit - I  
think this will help intermediaries cope when we actually get  
multiplexing going.

Dave.
-- 
Dave Cridland - mailto:[e-mail] - xmpp:[e-mail]
  - acap://acap.dave.cridland.net/byowner/user/dwd/bookmarks/
  - http://dave.cridland.net/
Infotrope Polymer - ACAP, IMAP, ESMTP, and Lemonade