Re: [hybi] Process! was: [whatwg] HttpOnly cookie for WebSocket?

Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org> Fri, 29 January 2010 22:21 UTC

Return-Path: <jamie@shareable.org>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 892CD3A68C3 for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 14:21:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.203
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.203 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.006, BAYES_00=-2.599, PLING_QUERY=1.39]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XdM97uz8jJjj for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 14:21:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail2.shareable.org (mail2.shareable.org [80.68.89.115]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 476BE3A67FC for <hybi@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 14:21:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from jamie by mail2.shareable.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <jamie@shareable.org>) id 1NazDQ-0005bt-EZ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 22:21:24 +0000
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 22:21:24 +0000
From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
To: SM <sm@resistor.net>
Message-ID: <20100129222124.GB19124@shareable.org>
References: <4B616F17.4030402@ericsson.com> <4B619223.60408@webtide.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1001282141080.22020@ps20323.dreamhostps.com> <4B620B8F.6030706@gmx.de> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1001282217320.22053@ps20323.dreamhostps.com> <bbeaa26f1001281449q1a6e1813q3f537fe15a5a9d60@mail.gmail.com> <4B625733.2020907@webtide.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20100128225542.06fa8d68@resistor.net> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1001290817520.22020@ps20323.dreamhostps.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20100129023917.06806000@resistor.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20100129023917.06806000@resistor.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
Cc: Hybi <hybi@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [hybi] Process! was: [whatwg] HttpOnly cookie for WebSocket?
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 22:21:05 -0000

SM wrote:
> The WHATWG can continue working on the specifications.  This Working 
> Group will probably work on their own version of the specification 
> too.  The outcome will be two different specifications for the same 
> technology.  I don't think that is in the interest of the Internet 
> community.

If one specification does not address significant requirements, and
the other specification does but will take a long time to arrive, then
it may well be in the interest of the internet community to have both.

-- Jamie