IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hybi] I-D Action: draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-13.txt

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Thu, 08 September 2011 17:38 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BE9121F8B6B for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 10:38:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zb-YROobNtqE for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 10:38:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D89A321F8573 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 10:38:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-64-101-72-209.cisco.com (unknown [64.101.72.209]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 11DFF40E87; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 11:43:14 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <4E68FDFD.4000307@stpeter.im>
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 11:40:13 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110902 Thunderbird/6.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: SM <sm@resistor.net>
References: <20110831184207.1514.64093.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <0fc901cc6878$1681eec0$0a00a8c0@Venus> <CAH9hSJb2rH+fX0AnekYxsEkHKzb15aHrg_hDQw1baWLiWBF-3w@mail.gmail.com> <17b501cc6d31$3016d6d0$0a00a8c0@Venus> <CAH9hSJYhLpcXrOtS-nzLt2YW9QbngEsfdcNF+0TadyVA6rrK1A@mail.gmail.com> <17ef01cc6d39$3575ae50$0a00a8c0@Venus> <20110907085128.GA19144@1wt.eu> <CAH9hSJYXZ285L_+eJh6VUVCAg4D+u=vQbcjVOA4RMsJSbcHqiw@mail.gmail.com> <CABLsOLBKgnTFga821t2AZ1dXobTsfMb5v8CTJhm_Nr8WMkonaA@mail.gmail.com> <53451FDB-77F7-42A1-8D16-05094C35AB5D@bbn.com> <4E68E9F6.6030901@stpeter.im> <CA566BAEAD6B3F4E8B5C5C4F61710C11448BDC88@TK5EX14MBXW604.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com> <1B54A085-1AF4-4324-B252-0C8BE778A69D@bbn.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20110908100609.09b47a58@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20110908100609.09b47a58@resistor.net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.1
OpenPGP: url=https://stpeter.im/stpeter.asc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: hybi@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [hybi] I-D Action: draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-13.txt
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 17:38:23 -0000

On 9/8/11 11:14 AM, SM wrote:
> At 09:31 08-09-2011, Richard L. Barnes wrote:
>> I think I understood that consensus slightly differently, more as a
>> capability + operational practice than a protocol requirement.  Like I
>> said to John, whatever the text says, masking will be appropriate in
>> most cases.
> 
> I read this more as operational practice than a protocol requirement.  I
> am fine with the consensus.

SM, to clarify, you are fine with what Richard Barnes proposed, or with
other text?

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email