IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hybi] Review of draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-13

Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> Tue, 06 September 2011 15:40 UTC

Return-Path: <ibc@aliax.net>
X-Original-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7206021F8C22; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 08:40:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.646
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.646 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.031, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JyC14e5sjhR4; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 08:40:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qw0-f52.google.com (mail-qw0-f52.google.com [209.85.216.52]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF6B921F8B74; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 08:40:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qwb8 with SMTP id 8so5494502qwb.25 for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 06 Sep 2011 08:42:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.28.200 with SMTP id n8mr4005449qcc.291.1315323726277; Tue, 06 Sep 2011 08:42:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.79.207 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 08:42:06 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <E5AF4413-1929-46E3-B500-207BBC53D6CE@bbn.com>
References: <942CCA6B-B784-441B-96CA-3506FFC439E1@bbn.com> <CALiegfmyQ5h4S2FgBnrh2VLr8+q-h0sLiGsww7T+1VwYNRo4wQ@mail.gmail.com> <72E40A0F-C923-472F-9534-538B89F7A444@bbn.com> <CALiegfm9GT1B9zseiNfatT1L0JpqihkZ3m=oNz9fA20dx8BVBA@mail.gmail.com> <E5AF4413-1929-46E3-B500-207BBC53D6CE@bbn.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 17:42:06 +0200
Message-ID: <CALiegfkP_hbBzDEqTGoRiHaGZcHFrLBZ+2Vadybd42XgOHaiWg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
To: "Richard L. Barnes" <rbarnes@bbn.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, hybi@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [hybi] Review of draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-13
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 15:40:20 -0000

2011/9/6 Richard L. Barnes <rbarnes@bbn.com>:
> This makes sense to me, given the clarification around what "messages" are.  One slight revision just for succinctness:
> "
>   1007 indicates that an endpoint is terminating the connection
>   because it has received a text message that was not valid UTF-8 [RFC3629].
> "
> Text messages are the only ones in this spec that have to be UTF-8, and future things that are also UTF-8 should have their own error codes.
>
> Note that this is independent of whether validation is required on a frame or message level.

Hi Richard, I've started a new thread suggesting this change for 1007
status code. Could you please reply there with your suggestion?

Thanks a lot.

PS: I agree with your proposal in your mail.
PSS: Why do you say that the spec does not clarify "what a message
is"? IMHO it does.

-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email