Re: [hybi] Experiment comparing Upgrade and CONNECT handshakes

Greg Wilkins <gregw@webtide.com> Thu, 02 December 2010 05:12 UTC

Return-Path: <gregw@intalio.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDB973A68B1 for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 21:12:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.622
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.622 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.355, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gzDF1IRe+xlw for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 21:11:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qw0-f44.google.com (mail-qw0-f44.google.com [209.85.216.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 191F43A68AF for <hybi@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 21:11:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: by qwg5 with SMTP id 5so6842727qwg.31 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 21:13:01 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.224.174.8 with SMTP id r8mr8498979qaz.332.1291266781122; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 21:13:01 -0800 (PST)
Sender: gregw@intalio.com
Received: by 10.220.167.203 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 21:13:01 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <5CB83789-EC99-4DF1-B573-5683B153E9D9@apple.com>
References: <AANLkTik0wR-Oag5YJJDmdiSy67WW6TMaHmqWEo4o5kGW@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTimwEtKrJm5KxTYZ4wrtONBYDTGjE5LF7__AHBEU@mail.gmail.com> <20101201183540.GF19021@1wt.eu> <AANLkTi=r-is4ZqJc6itsaBkyrmW746xXj8OV78M_Qbi3@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTimtjYUOidZcxkSEtaUniJC6m8ujzFa69DMQVhZH@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTimQ3bm5-2tN0QEt=qX4CR_XFpcLXF7Auz2ijo0Z@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTing3grEETt4s2CVSu4BtHPXOA8_MAm=sBQpYaJx@mail.gmail.com> <5CB83789-EC99-4DF1-B573-5683B153E9D9@apple.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 06:13:01 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: c8wrnrixAVdqT_vAheA11K0bbPc
Message-ID: <AANLkTik6Xx6Q-ogEkxW0qWnK7wboANFDzYwQA6aytRA-@mail.gmail.com>
From: Greg Wilkins <gregw@webtide.com>
To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: Hybi <hybi@ietf.org>, Zhong Yu <zhong.j.yu@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [hybi] Experiment comparing Upgrade and CONNECT handshakes
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 05:12:02 -0000

On 1 December 2010 22:51, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> wrote:
> There is a reasonable subset of Adam & Eric's proposal that includes
> CONNECT, but omits the bogus host header, JSON headers and payload masking.
> It would not have unframed bytes or space encoded nonces.

+1

> I think that would be a decent starting point, after which we could evaluate
> the remaining aspects.

Good call!