Re: [hybi] New port and Tunneling?

["Shelby Moore" <[e-mail]>]

> On Wed Aug 18 09:14:09 2010, Shelby Moore wrote:
>> > After sending this email, I am going to take some time to read
>> some of
>> > your publications, so I can understand better your expertise.
>>
>> Thank you for providing public copies of your research papers.
>>
>> Now I am going to teach you (arrogant? maybe, but not desired, just
>> the
>> way it is[1]).
>
> Is this really the best forum for this?

I don't know.  Is this the best forum for the following?

http://www6.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi/current/msg02400.html

I raised the security issue specifically with respect to SOP on network
requests, because it applies to whether we could enable P2P with this
proposed WS over new port + tunnel, and whether we must apply SOP to
Websockets in any case.

And I don't know where to have that very narrow security discussion else
where amongst motivated participants?

Then again, maybe it is simply a punt for this WG and just specify that
the implementation must decide?  That way as the future understanding
morphs on SOP, then WebSockets standard won't be voided.  I had read a
little bit of HTML5 and seems to be conflating itself with the security
and forcing certain SOP paradigms?