IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hybi] Experiment comparing Upgrade and CONNECT handshakes

Zhong Yu <zhong.j.yu@gmail.com> Fri, 03 December 2010 08:26 UTC

Return-Path: <zhong.j.yu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ACC428C1A6 for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 00:26:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.267
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.267 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.332, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pqs1BkYlDPce for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 00:26:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qy0-f179.google.com (mail-qy0-f179.google.com [209.85.216.179]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9215528C1B2 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 00:26:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by qyk11 with SMTP id 11so9791885qyk.10 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 00:27:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=9Zft1BJJskvh3n3NYHtwQTw9Xqo7OL38ukAQuKLwPbY=; b=LY+RvymS4Tl6kGjoIWzrWvgjY8HqZOeQg7UXxr+0WrgMcZq3kPSEDT5Me6fojNcJFS HskslzHZYJ2UlK4WC9GtE5NMoL9hvZjwGHayBrwi3CjlDtt7sr7BHha5lhqDY7KD206b XpYqw/l+myylDAuFo45OdGQiPGWkfOHX3OL0Y=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=HhNMFgb6CHNhJUjuD9EEBl7uawqvr+GlI1ItlY5+Y6HDB0RogxcdswGb4Qass7A3Ro NqkGzsn15lcgcxvxgBx1rkmxEzKTMjAZ/M5Gb2e7ZABGMJyeCOY7IzclmjQ0MkJVswHk wRCxoJp5Lu5AuutbJFjWXwPSde50SKfPz1R5g=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.224.196.2 with SMTP id ee2mr994819qab.268.1291364839349; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 00:27:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.220.99.212 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 00:27:19 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTik+pmVoyK0fkz6mG0+KDqdvyVxaYtM9w7KDo4Xa@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTik0wR-Oag5YJJDmdiSy67WW6TMaHmqWEo4o5kGW@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTimwEtKrJm5KxTYZ4wrtONBYDTGjE5LF7__AHBEU@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTik+pmVoyK0fkz6mG0+KDqdvyVxaYtM9w7KDo4Xa@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 02:27:19 -0600
Message-ID: <AANLkTind6kZrMkm3N-HtFH+Wd5RFshwnFBb21OvJHJpU@mail.gmail.com>
From: Zhong Yu <zhong.j.yu@gmail.com>
To: Adam Barth <ietf@adambarth.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: Hybi <hybi@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [hybi] Experiment comparing Upgrade and CONNECT handshakes
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 08:26:50 -0000

Adam, is there any chance that the POST experiment poisoned a cache
first, then the Upgrade experiment, which is carried out immediately
afterward, fetched the same poisoned cached result from proxy, and
counted it as a success attack in the Upgrade experiment?

- Zhong Yu

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email