Re: [hybi] Process! was: [whatwg] HttpOnly cookie for WebSocket?

[Maciej Stachowiak <[e-mail]>]

On Feb 1, 2010, at 3:25 AM, Ian Hickson wrote:

> On Fri, 29 Jan 2010, Julian Reschke wrote:
>> Ian Hickson wrote:
>>> 
>>> The same way it works with the HTML5 specification and the various Web 
>>> Apps specifications -- feedback is collected from both groups (and 
>>> indeed, anywhere else that feedback is provided, e.g. on blogs or 
>>> forums), and changes are made that take into account all the feedback. 
>>> The most active members of both groups stay in regular contact, e.g. 
>>> on IRC, or by e-mail, to ensure that everyone is on the same page. 
>>> Where editorial differences arise (e.g. the IETF prefers text/plain 
>>> specs, the WHATWG prefers HTML- based specs), the groups ensure that 
>>> normative requirement remain identical across different versions. 
>>> Basically, exactly as has been happening for the past few years 
>>> already. ...
>> 
>> Feedback that affects the contents of a WG deliverable should be 
>> submitted as "IETF Contribution", as described in 
>> <http://www.ietf.org/about/note-well.html>.
> 
> I'm not going to ignore feedback that is sent outside the context of this 
> working group.

I don't think the rules that Julian linked require that. The RFCs that apply to IETF contributions per that page seem to be about requirements relating to intellectual property rights. Specifically, grant of non-exclusive copyright license to the IETF Trust, and patent disclosure obligations. I am not sure of their relevance to this thread. 

Regards,
Maciej