Re: [hybi] I-D Action: draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-09.txt

Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> Tue, 21 June 2011 09:56 UTC

Return-Path: <ibc@aliax.net>
X-Original-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FFF09E804A for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 02:56:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.661
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.661 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.016, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NPxGmx-ZwBOj for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 02:56:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qy0-f179.google.com (mail-qy0-f179.google.com [209.85.216.179]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87C019E8046 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 02:56:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qyk29 with SMTP id 29so3148556qyk.10 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 02:56:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.115.21 with SMTP id g21mr4740422qcq.230.1308650186936; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 02:56:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.181.209 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 02:56:26 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4E00666C.6050007@ericsson.com>
References: <20110613233745.27187.94588.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <BANLkTinWuzj3V12eerjX0f13yYNdynTOjQ@mail.gmail.com> <4E004D3D.3020305@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <BANLkTi=T2YLpH4U=qduv_qFZVO3EyLPAUw@mail.gmail.com> <4E00569E.4030400@ericsson.com> <BANLkTikm33-EQDaRwJM8yJ34QgmrxN7FgQ@mail.gmail.com> <4E0064D9.8050707@gmx.de> <4E00666C.6050007@ericsson.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:56:26 +0200
Message-ID: <BANLkTik+the09ZcuuyYp4nWEKztTNWmMwA@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?I=C3=B1aki_Baz_Castillo?= <ibc@aliax.net>
To: Salvatore Loreto <salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: hybi@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [hybi] I-D Action: draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-09.txt
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 09:56:28 -0000

2011/6/21 Salvatore Loreto <salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com>om>:
> my comment was about keeping the Sec-WebSocket-Version header.

I agree.

> What number (and format) should be put there at the end, in the final RFC,
> it is a different story.

What I mean is that, IMHO, it should be "1.0" (or whatever other
agreed value) from now until the draft becomes an RFC, rather than
incrementing such a value in each draft technical modification.

-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>