IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hybi] Call for Consensus: draft-tyoshino-hybi-websocket-perframe-deflate as WG Item

Takeshi Yoshino <tyoshino@google.com> Thu, 01 March 2012 20:04 UTC

Return-Path: <tyoshino@google.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FCDB21F8A9F for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 12:04:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.955
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.955 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.021, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K74Hm57E8sDT for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 12:04:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yx0-f172.google.com (mail-yx0-f172.google.com [209.85.213.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F41321F8A93 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 12:04:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: by yenm5 with SMTP id m5so530869yen.31 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Thu, 01 Mar 2012 12:04:43 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of tyoshino@google.com designates 10.100.225.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.100.225.18;
Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of tyoshino@google.com designates 10.100.225.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=tyoshino@google.com; dkim=pass header.i=tyoshino@google.com
Received: from mr.google.com ([10.100.225.18]) by 10.100.225.18 with SMTP id x18mr2907280ang.48.1330632283497 (num_hops = 1); Thu, 01 Mar 2012 12:04:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:x-system-of-record; bh=MfWv702BAlbHm9LccdBl1Jmm3pefvsRQpBPf/WqROpI=; b=ZGl57bni3ucjGx4ARuaIJFpeYzH+gAYK5OH7ghZvoQsPCJ3MHZ0AKWm/hJE/Xa8NgM e2vEIT/uX9Ny9yt/tlbrjv234/WzNyrmdgsp8uiAtyNEyAkuCQH3UynMJqxsXtHsPVNf mATmtqM+dTw6IZUr2G8lGx47H8KBjMJYNL0pYFh8PQuSP3X1ZCO1jcxoIt+5kfzOsOtp gB/xkV1VCepxk7VGM4G8q74czPXwjTN/usOv87pxy5XG+Jby4jnPj8g3AyYRDOZxD5jO DHxuigruhUuH2xU+lY39K0UOKgOtrqPic7pBJlECNKjH04qZLDMBxsIVr/cpBvplBVlY 8ZTg==
Received: by 10.100.225.18 with SMTP id x18mr2295466ang.48.1330632283436; Thu, 01 Mar 2012 12:04:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.100.225.18 with SMTP id x18mr2295457ang.48.1330632283281; Thu, 01 Mar 2012 12:04:43 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.101.155.5 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 12:04:23 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAH_y2NF0mG9+PWotJmG0e4trgSxhOtaoGXLeeQUS1Tn5zpZuYQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4F4C8568.7070403@ericsson.com> <CAH_y2NF0mG9+PWotJmG0e4trgSxhOtaoGXLeeQUS1Tn5zpZuYQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Takeshi Yoshino <tyoshino@google.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 15:04:23 -0500
Message-ID: <CAH9hSJakzY8RAHgBgQbjGq4GvPJFdrtS8TXt_aUqjiwZCOZR-g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001636b4325692593004ba33f884"
X-System-Of-Record: true
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkm6o3Gg/vDZfMVjy2wX5Lmr77U3rsmqQBKGfMNgFJhOoImua3hVGDKCjkZwgKvF8wuWzHG4SN9scLIoWId/Tg4Pb7GmhXNrvbnFATfuRVSYQWJvdsdVID+sVU1tT3KdDi7jeU1
Cc: "hybi@ietf.org" <hybi@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [hybi] Call for Consensus: draft-tyoshino-hybi-websocket-perframe-deflate as WG Item
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 20:04:46 -0000

On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 18:10, Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> wrote:

>
>
> +1 to have it adopted as a base line for further discussion and refinement.
>
> I share Johns concern about the allocation of a reserved bit to the
> extension and think that we should go through a process of exhaustively
> considering all the alternatives before allocation of such a scarce
> resource.
>

Yes.

I also wonder if it's useful to make it able to negotiate whether to use
compression bit or not on opening handshake.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email