[hybi] [Errata Rejected] RFC6455 (8491)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Sat, 19 July 2025 08:36 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: hybi@ietf.org
Delivered-To: hybi@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from rfcpa.rfc-editor.org (unknown [167.172.21.234]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCED845F626B; Sat, 19 Jul 2025 01:36:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 461) id 8D7672634B2; Sat, 19 Jul 2025 01:36:48 -0700 (PDT)
To: samuel871211@gmail.com, ifette+ietf@google.com, Alexey.Melnikov@isode.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20250719083648.8D7672634B2@rfcpa.rfc-editor.org>
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2025 01:36:48 -0700
Message-ID-Hash: U2D3SSX7NGWCFMDE2UDJ2F4VIDTVVBQS
X-Message-ID-Hash: U2D3SSX7NGWCFMDE2UDJ2F4VIDTVVBQS
X-MailFrom: wwwrun@rfcpa.rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-hybi.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: mbishop@evequefou.be, iesg@ietf.org, hybi@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [hybi] [Errata Rejected] RFC6455 (8491)
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hybi/vMT4OSS_mpEbO6ieAbAt1Jdu0GI>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hybi>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:hybi-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:hybi-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:hybi-leave@ietf.org>
The following errata report has been rejected for RFC6455, "The WebSocket Protocol". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid8491 -------------------------------------- Status: Rejected Type: Technical Reported by: YuSheng Chen <samuel871211@gmail.com> Date Reported: 2025-06-28 Rejected by: Mike Bishop (WIT AD) (IESG) Section: 9.1 Original Text ------------- is exactly equivalent to Sec-WebSocket-Extensions: foo, bar; baz=2 Corrected Text -------------- is exactly equivalent to Sec-WebSocket-Extensions: foo; bar; baz=2 Notes ----- Should be semicolon-separated --VERIFIER NOTES-- RFC 6455 defines this field in Section 9.1 as: extension-list = 1#extension extension = extension-token *( ";" extension-param ) While the reporter is noting the ";" between extension-token and extension-param, the separator between two extension elements is found in the definition of "#" from RFC 2616: #rule A construct "#" is defined, similar to "*", for defining lists of elements. The full form is "<n>#<m>element" indicating at least <n> and at most <m> elements, each separated by one or more commas (",") and OPTIONAL linear white space (LWS). This makes the usual form of lists very easy; a rule such as ( *LWS element *( *LWS "," *LWS element )) Thus, as is typical in HTTP fields other than Cookie, the delimiter between outermost elements is "," and ";" is an internal separator within an element. -------------------------------------- RFC6455 (draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-17) -------------------------------------- Title : The WebSocket Protocol Publication Date : December 2011 Author(s) : I. Fette, A. Melnikov Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : BiDirectional or Server-Initiated HTTP APP Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [hybi] [Errata Rejected] RFC6455 (8491) RFC Errata System