IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hybi] #1: HTTP Compliance

<L.Wood@surrey.ac.uk> Sun, 15 August 2010 18:34 UTC

Return-Path: <L.Wood@surrey.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 018CE3A6407 for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 11:34:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t17zXCbruYq1 for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 11:34:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail72.messagelabs.com (mail72.messagelabs.com [193.109.255.147]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D24B23A6403 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 11:34:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-VirusChecked: Checked
X-Env-Sender: L.Wood@surrey.ac.uk
X-Msg-Ref: server-9.tower-72.messagelabs.com!1281897316!13209636!1
X-StarScan-Version: 6.2.4; banners=-,-,-
X-Originating-IP: [131.227.200.31]
Received: (qmail 18752 invoked from network); 15 Aug 2010 18:35:16 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO EXHT011P.surrey.ac.uk) (131.227.200.31) by server-9.tower-72.messagelabs.com with AES128-SHA encrypted SMTP; 15 Aug 2010 18:35:16 -0000
Received: from EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk ([169.254.1.14]) by EXHT011P.surrey.ac.uk ([131.227.200.31]) with mapi; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 19:35:16 +0100
From: L.Wood@surrey.ac.uk
To: ietf@adambarth.com, shelby@coolpage.com
Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 19:35:16 +0100
Thread-Topic: [hybi] #1: HTTP Compliance
Thread-Index: Acs8pYmvPG1M8KGcTlyoZytLMuuVeAAAoepA
Message-ID: <FD7B10366AE3794AB1EC5DE97A93A3730C2BF05305@EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk>
References: <ae7473f15c4839c4efba4ea9fc4c0953.squirrel@sm.webmail.pair.com> <AANLkTinfY-g3zpCCWLov+384j-45cdCCzb1Cq+ByJVB2@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinfY-g3zpCCWLov+384j-45cdCCzb1Cq+ByJVB2@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, en-GB
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US, en-GB
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: hybi@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [hybi] #1: HTTP Compliance
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 18:34:42 -0000

>From the hybi IETF meeting minutes:
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/78/minutes/hybi.txt 

"WG Chair declared that there was consensus about HTTP compliance.  The Web socket protocol will be HTTP compliant until the Upgrade exchange is completed.  The focus is on leveraging existing HTTP based infrastructure."

Consensus only has to be rough majority, not absolute.

-----Original Message-----
From: hybi-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:hybi-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adam Barth
Sent: 15 August 2010 19:13
To: shelby@coolpage.com
Cc: hybi@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [hybi] #1: HTTP Compliance

On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Shelby Moore <shelby@coolpage.com> wrote:
> My objective was to make sure I understood well the issues (including 
> the view opposing the concensus) and possibly to swing them and any 
> lurkers to the concensus declaration:
>
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi/current/msg02955.html

That "declaration of consensus" was premature.  The working group has not reached consensus on that point.

Adam

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email