Re: [hybi] A consensus-driven process
"Shelby Moore" <shelby@coolpage.com> Mon, 16 August 2010 08:30 UTC
Return-Path: <shelby@coolpage.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39C333A680C for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 01:30:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.054
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.054 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.056, BAYES_05=-1.11]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7npiXBKUqrge for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 01:30:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from www5.webmail.pair.com (www5.webmail.pair.com [66.39.3.83]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 4F1CA3A688B for <hybi@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 01:30:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 1624 invoked by uid 65534); 16 Aug 2010 08:31:10 -0000
Received: from 121.97.54.174 ([121.97.54.174]) (SquirrelMail authenticated user shelby@coolpage.com) by sm.webmail.pair.com with HTTP; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 04:31:10 -0400
Message-ID: <b43211f5cf338107356d22d5177f7126.squirrel@sm.webmail.pair.com>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20100816000526.0931e838@resistor.net>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20100805215918.0b514dd8@elandnews.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20100816000526.0931e838@resistor.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 04:31:10 -0400
From: Shelby Moore <shelby@coolpage.com>
To: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.20
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal
Cc: hybi@ietf.org, Joe Hildebrand <jhildebr@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [hybi] A consensus-driven process
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: shelby@coolpage.com
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 08:30:36 -0000
I am trying to figure out if this was caused my me? Perhaps I did restart the debate because I didn't realize the 2 weeks hadn't elapse (remembered seeing that post but not making a mental note of when it was and not having time to go find it again...should have Googled I guess). Should I stop posting for 4 more days? As far as I remember, I have not intentionally issued any personal admonitions. Anything can be misinterpreted. I have written some comments about natural law (entropy, 2nd law of thermo, fundamental theorems of computer science), with a claim that the enterprise control model of security will die. I apologize if that offended any one, it wasn't intended to be an attack on any person or company in the enterprise business. And I am not pushing for the group to endorse a single transport to try to force that outcome. I am merely trying to help push for factual discovery which i am starting to think will lean us towards needing to support multiple transport options. I don't want any xx% to inpinge on the other xx%, but again I am not vested in the outcome because I don't believe groups can harm me (because in the end I am happy with a simple life even I lost everything else). Please let me know in private or public, if I am being in any way threatening to any person or company. > Hello, > > I posted a message about ten days ago about a two-week cooling down > period. I would like to thank those of you who have taken a > constructive approach and avoided any unpleasant comments. > > The IETF process allows for action to be taken if there are > inappropriate postings to IETF mailing lists. I encourage the > various parties to talk to each other and resolve their > issues. Abusive postings can be reported to the HyBi WG > Chairs. Please explain in your report what you consider as > inappropriate or abusive together with a recommendation on what action to > take. > > The above applies to everyone, including the WG Secretary. :-) > > Regards, > S. Moonesamy > HyBi WG Secretary > > _______________________________________________ > hybi mailing list > hybi@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi > >
- [hybi] A consensus-driven process S Moonesamy
- Re: [hybi] A consensus-driven process S Moonesamy
- Re: [hybi] A consensus-driven process Shelby Moore
- Re: [hybi] A consensus-driven process S Moonesamy