IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hybi] hum #3: Message

Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> Thu, 05 August 2010 20:18 UTC

Return-Path: <derhoermi@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB9263A68D9 for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Aug 2010 13:18:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.725
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.725 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.874, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kAPaAUB60-6p for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Aug 2010 13:18:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id B3C5D3A6886 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Aug 2010 13:18:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 05 Aug 2010 20:18:52 -0000
Received: from dslb-094-222-150-006.pools.arcor-ip.net (EHLO hive) [94.222.150.6] by mail.gmx.net (mp026) with SMTP; 05 Aug 2010 22:18:52 +0200
X-Authenticated: #723575
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX195SPVoe715jMQNkniZoPqEXxasXMvzpK0QIdvn1c n//thCEuR+HqPp
From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2010 22:18:51 +0200
Message-ID: <ho6m56dcrk08v96kncnf0ua382e0e84qk0@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>
References: <4C5AE93D.4040803@ericsson.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1008051758290.5947@ps20323.dreamhostps.com> <AANLkTik0kbh14s2JZARY2MFh0iNGV7H+B4Px4yG+wX44@mail.gmail.com> <71BCE4BF-D3F6-4F94-BE76-306BDF6A2E67@apple.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1008051930160.5947@ps20323.dreamhostps.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1008051930160.5947@ps20323.dreamhostps.com>
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Cc: "hybi@ietf.org" <hybi@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [hybi] hum #3: Message
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2010 20:18:24 -0000

* Ian Hickson wrote:
>Having to split a 2GB file into a bazilion pieces and write each one out 
>individually with frame headers, compared to just writing the whole thing 
>at once, seems inefficient far beyond simply the concern about the 
>on-the-wire overhead.

In order to determine how efficient the whole process would be, we would
have to factor in the overhead of the underlying protocols. For instance
how widely the IPv6 "jumbo payload" option is available in a couple of
years and how it carries through the networks.
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email