Re: [hybi] frame length encoding

+1

This fulfills what I was trying to achieve with Option 1/15-bit, but uses
the extra byte more efficiently.  I predict this will be the winner.  It
hits all the needs.

> Ack.
>
> -Pieter
>
> On Aug 23, 2010 1:26 AM, "Brian" <theturtle32@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I still think option #2 is the best compromise, and a number of people
>>> agreed (and a number disagreed). If that option isn't deemed acceptable
> and
>>> having 4 length steps is preferred, I would rather just eat the extra
> byte
>>> for small frames and go with the suggestion above, having headers of 3,
> 4,
>>> 6, and 10 bytes with 8 reserved bits between the defined flags and the
>>> opcode, as in:
>>>
>>> - More - 1 bit
>>> - CMLP - 1 bit
>>> - LenLen - 2 bits
>>> - Reserved - 8 bits
>>> - Opcode - 4 bits
>>> - Length - 2^LenLen bytes
>>> - CML - 8 bytes - present only if CMLP=1
>>> - Payload - Length bytes
>>>
>>> Otherwise, as before.
>>>
>>>
>> +1
>>
>>
>> Brian McKelvey
> _______________________________________________
> hybi mailing list
> hybi@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi
>