Re: [hybi] I-D Action: draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-09.txt

Ian Fette (イアンフェッティ) <ifette@google.com> Tue, 14 June 2011 17:02 UTC

Return-Path: <ifette@google.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0F14228007 for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 10:02:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.676
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.676 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ztVHrpr-l86l for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 10:02:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-out.google.com (smtp-out.google.com [74.125.121.67]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CEE5228006 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 10:02:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wpaz9.hot.corp.google.com (wpaz9.hot.corp.google.com [172.24.198.73]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id p5EH2t34008619 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 10:02:56 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; t=1308070976; bh=VEXtP31Inp98H6cZ+DksHZiUayo=; h=MIME-Version:Reply-To:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: Subject:From:To:Cc:Content-Type; b=kTO12ciRxHjfcxEFjtG1BOVngUUSiiIOrA31A42B1czqOYdrQU3Pil0Rl5/qunX95 I6idOVl25P5I1q67iXgHw==
Received: from qwj8 (qwj8.prod.google.com [10.241.195.72]) by wpaz9.hot.corp.google.com with ESMTP id p5EH2RSo014679 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for <hybi@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 10:02:54 -0700
Received: by qwj8 with SMTP id 8so3389779qwj.4 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 10:02:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=2WhGSn85OW/3UdgWrSX0H9FWnGKDSoHFm6yUyHGKVyo=; b=vjCpUageFr9BmCzWYWglip0NUc4o8VjCsDzFVhRDoFKNysR3Gh1QXlQPNhZBwAtTni 2oXC1VJC2bjT11l9RL8A==
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=google.com; s=beta; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=Ixfqi29acYzC9vN1DHnbhSvcxjnnq9pArp0pdvZIcDwzCrNB0KSOQe+4uiElkeiPjt B1fYTv0mWH02JocZZZvg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.118.78 with SMTP id u14mr5116107qcq.29.1308070974407; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 10:02:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.137.137 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 10:02:54 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1308062227.1944.162.camel@ds9>
References: <20110613233745.27187.94588.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <BANLkTik3Lgp9H4EW1BwRj=n+OQFz6YN547A4y69SysoF7UXnzw@mail.gmail.com> <1308062227.1944.162.camel@ds9>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 10:02:54 -0700
Message-ID: <BANLkTim3PT8y3+u-99BRVb1WwzFUZyxAXQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?B?SWFuIEZldHRlICjjgqTjgqLjg7Pjg5Xjgqfjg4Pjg4bjgqMp?= <ifette@google.com>
To: Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd5f4aac5443504a5af011a
X-System-Of-Record: true
Cc: "hybi@ietf.org" <hybi@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [hybi] I-D Action: draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-09.txt
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ifette@google.com
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:02:58 -0000

There was an email to the chairs pointing out that unknown values in
reserved bits vs unknown opcode values were handled differently. The chairs
discussed and asked me to make them both fail.

On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 7:37 AM, Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>wrote;wrote:

> On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 15:38 +0900, Takeshi Yoshino wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Semantic change
> > - any of RSV=1 : ignore the value -> _Fail the WebSocket Connection_
> > (section4.2)
> >
>
>
> Ian, Gabriel, Salvatore,
>
> As always, thanks for the updates?
>
> I'm trying to figure out where this change came from? I can't find a
> reference to it in any of the feedback on -08, though I'm probably
> overlooking something.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> hybi mailing list
> hybi@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi
>