IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hybi] Masking only Payload/Extension Data

Adam Barth <ietf@adambarth.com> Thu, 10 March 2011 08:38 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@adambarth.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF0FE3A6886 for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 00:38:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.799
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.178, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WbwzplBfkcOR for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 00:38:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yx0-f172.google.com (mail-yx0-f172.google.com [209.85.213.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2EF43A683B for <hybi@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 00:38:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by yxk30 with SMTP id 30so749195yxk.31 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 00:39:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.150.147.5 with SMTP id u5mr694945ybd.307.1299746381127; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 00:39:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com (mail-iy0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v15sm2111349ybk.18.2011.03.10.00.39.38 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 10 Mar 2011 00:39:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by iyj8 with SMTP id 8so1651930iyj.31 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 00:39:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.42.221.71 with SMTP id ib7mr2669396icb.110.1299746378133; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 00:39:38 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.231.10.200 with HTTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 00:39:08 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=i=8aWg=6+T7=Kn5dWeKkW6MYVCH_CuNkt_ZMM@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4D77B885.5050109@callenish.com> <OF36FEDDC6.06951577-ON8825784E.0062343E-8825784E.0066AC27@playstation.sony.com> <AANLkTinau4g1pB_ccJ31u7WRi5npYtHvXE5YRn5uTbeV@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTikB4YeaYiF_NVGn61c1YxpNWbmEWQZu1WcN+=Jf@mail.gmail.com> <1299704939.2606.238.camel@ds9.ducksong.com> <20110309214212.GA29190@1wt.eu> <AANLkTi=i=8aWg=6+T7=Kn5dWeKkW6MYVCH_CuNkt_ZMM@mail.gmail.com>
From: Adam Barth <ietf@adambarth.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 00:39:08 -0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTimip9o0RoZaBfONCmg5nuJVWXjOKDKgAt8zrNVV@mail.gmail.com>
To: Joel Martin <hybi@martintribe.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: Hybi <hybi@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [hybi] Masking only Payload/Extension Data
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 08:38:24 -0000

-1 for masking only payload/extension data.  It's less secure, and
that's not acceptable.

Adam


On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 10:28 PM, Joel Martin <hybi@martintribe.org> wrote:
> +1 for masking only payload/extension data.
> No opinion on whether to use an opcode bit or not for this.
> Joel Martin (kanaka)
> _______________________________________________
> hybi mailing list
> hybi@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email